Search for: "GAMBLE v. GAMBLE"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 2,210
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2014, 4:15 am
Whether a result of attorneys seeking to track their preliminary invalidity contentions, or just hoping to present a 102 rejection, the end result can be quite significant as recently demonstrated in The Procter & Gamble Company v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 12:02 pm
Public Safety Realignment) allowing the early release of thousands of state prison inmates, Associate Justice Alito wrote a dissent in the Supreme Court case of Brown v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 4:00 am
SEC v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 9:47 am
The Dallas case is Choctaw Nation v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 6:20 am
In Hall v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 4:38 am
The trial judge reduced the damages to $6,000,000 for pain and suffering and $600,000 for loss of consortium, In Nemeth v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:00 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 1:24 am
Don’t gamble. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 4:24 am
For one thing, I was highly critical of him in Florence v. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 11:39 am
#4: Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 10:31 am
In 2008’s Doe v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 3:29 pm
Goldman’s gamble paid off. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 4:41 am
The Trunki caseThe key cases relevant to these questions were Proctor & Gamble v Reckitt Benckiser [2007] EWCA Civ 936, in which it was held that a registered design based on a line drawing was for the shape alone, and Samsung v Apple [2012] EWCA Civ 1339, in which Apple had contended that lack of ornamentation was a feature of the simple line drawing of a tablet which they had registered as the design. [read post]
30 May 2022, 10:24 am
The Nokia v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 8:10 am
See Clark v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 3:07 am
American University v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 5:45 am
He said more or less the same thing in a concurrence in Gamble v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 3:47 pm
Last month the Supreme Court held in Janus v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 10:20 am
Co. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 9:42 am
Procter & Gamble Co., 434 F.2d 794, 804 (9th Cir. 1970)). [read post]
