Search for: "Givens v. Givens"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 76,032
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2009, 1:59 pm
Brown v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 6:12 am
April 20, 2007), getting a remand on a Batson v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 9:14 am
In Doncaster MBC v BBC ([2010] EWHC 53 (QB)) Mr Justice Tugendhat drew attention to serial breaches of the requirements of the rules and of section 12(2) of the Human Rights Act 1998 (which requires notice to be given in cases where orders may affect freedom of expression) on an injunction application. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 12:15 pm
We have been following Airgas v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 8:50 am
” It’s a good theory and a great sentiment, but given the number of bicycle/motor-vehicle accidents in the news, it seems it’s not all that simple to put into practice. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 4:31 pm
On April 17, 2012, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 2:53 am
Lynch v Ceva Logistic Ltd and another [2011] EWCA Civ 188; [ 2011] WLR (D) 66 “The owner of a warehouse who had the control of it (1) owed a duty under regulations 4 and 17 of the Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992 and at common law to ensure that the place of work was safe for an employee of an independent contractor who was carrying out his work in the warehouse and (2) was entitled to assume that the independent contractor had given proper instructions… [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 8:01 am
On April 18, 2012, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Salazar v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 2:30 am
Threlfall v Hull City Council [2010] EWCA Civ 1147; [2010] WLR (D) 262 “In cases where an employee had been provided with equipment to use in his employment, but injury had occurred and the question arose whether such ‘personal protective equipment’ had been ‘suitable’ for regulatory purposes and issues of negligence, regard was to be given to both regs 4 and 6 of the Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992; and the concept of… [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:04 am
Following on Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 [Our report] and Lord Jackson’s view on JR costs, the Court of Appeal in M v London Borough of Croydon [2012] EWCA Civ 595 has given general guidance for awarding costs. [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:04 am
Following on Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 [Our report] and Lord Jackson’s view on JR costs, the Court of Appeal in M v London Borough of Croydon [2012] EWCA Civ 595 has given general guidance for awarding costs. [read post]
19 Sep 2024, 4:30 am
Finally, Part V summarizes the implications of the Trump v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 8:18 am
Three arguments were given for fixing the success fee at once. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 7:00 am
Gill v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 2:57 am
Following Société Eram Shipping Co Ltd v Cie Internationale de Navigation [2003] UKHL 30; [2004] 1 AC 260, this was fatal to the granting of third party debt orders. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 2:13 pm
Here's the latest chapter in the Skyland Shopping Center saga that has given us Franco v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 6:36 pm
MDY Industries, LLC v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 8:04 pm
Co. v Sentry Ins. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 1:53 pm
A recent, unpublished legal decision (Rapid Settlements v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 1:43 pm
The Court of Appeal says that it "elected to proceed with the opinion given because the appeal was fully briefed and raised important issues. [read post]
