Search for: "Grant v. State" Results 1401 - 1420 of 68,490
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2013, 10:57 am by Gene Quinn
Earlier today the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued it latest decision in Soverain Software LLC v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 8:52 am by Leandra Lederman
Supreme Court grant certiorari in Altera v. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 11:20 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
An excerpt: The panel affirmed the district court’s grant of the Bureau of Indian Affairs’ motion for summary judgment and ejectment order in an action brought by a group of recreational vehicle owners seeking to retain their rights to remain on a lakeside RV park located on American Indian land held in trust by the Bureau. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 1:36 am by Kevin LaCroix
On Monday, June 11, 2012, the United States Supreme Court granted the petition of Amgen for a writ of certiorari in a securities lawsuit pending against the company. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 9:27 am by familylawchildcustodydivorce
The Michigan Supreme Court granted leave to appeal the case Foster v Wolkowitz in response to the defendant’s request. [read post]
14 May 2018, 9:51 am by Amy Howe
The first grant came in BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm by Don Cruse
Grants of Review TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF AGING AND DISABILITY SERVICES A/K/A BRENHAM STATE SCHOOL, ANTHONY V. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 9:42 am by Ann Carlson
Headlines about today’s decision in Loper v Raimondo overturning the 40 year-old decision in Chevron v NRDC that granted agencies deference in their interpretation of ambiguous statutes  focus on the “massive power grab,” the decision’s “sweeping” nature and call it a  “blow” to the administrative state. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 2:55 pm
  In my view, the criminal cases granted today do not have any blockbuster potential, although I find intriguing that a grant in one case indirectly brings state clemency issues before the court. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 2:45 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Quoting Fletcher: The case is narrowly focused on the state’s ability to sue under the tribal-state compact — not the merits of the casino question itself, said Matthew Fletcher, director of the Indigenous Law and Policy Center at Michigan State University. [read post]