Search for: "Graves v. United States" Results 1401 - 1420 of 1,640
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2010, 6:26 am by Jeff Gamso
  Not surprisingly, Macumber was convicted and sentenced to life.I don't know how many factually innocent people are in prison in the United States. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 7:05 am by Sheppard Mullin
Major A recent decision by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas may have caused grave damage to protections long available to overseas government contractors and their employees under the Defense Base Act (“DBA”), 42 U.S.C. [read post]
27 May 2010, 4:46 am
  And it might help account for the fact that prison sentences in the United States are so much lengthier than sentences for the same crimes in other comparable Western countries. [read post]
21 May 2010, 9:34 am by Diana L. Skaggs
      Although family mobility has been global for decades, the United States Supreme Court, for the first time,[1] has interpreted a provision of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, a treaty to which the United States is a contracting state. [read post]
19 May 2010, 8:53 am
The United States Supreme Court ruled that an order prohibiting the removal of a child from a country without the non-custodial parent's consent is enforceable under an international child abduction treaty, In Abbott v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 8:53 am by Daniel Clement
The United States Supreme Court ruled that an order prohibiting the removal of a child from a country without the non-custodial parent's consent is enforceable under an international child abduction treaty, In Abbott v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 3:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
City of New York Department of Corrections et al.,09-2634-cv UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT;010 U.S. [read post]
11 May 2010, 2:59 am
Last week, in the wake of the State Supreme Court's ruling in Brayton et al. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 8:31 am
Nebgen (2nd Dept., decided 4/27/2010) In  Graham v Dunkley, 50 AD3d 55 (2nd Dept. 2008), the Appellate Division, Second Department, held that "the Graves Amendment was a constitutional exercise of congressional power pursuant to the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 9:03 am by ALeonard
Interestingly, the decision by Justice Mariano Del Castillo begins with a quotation from a United States Supreme Court opinion by Justice Robert C. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 2:11 pm by Tuan Samahon
Souter to be Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States: Hearings Before the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, 101st Cong. 363 (1991). [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 6:37 pm by Brian Shiffrin
(People v Gonzalez, 68 NY2d 424, 427 [1986]; Gordon v People, 33 NY 501 [1865]; Graves v United States, 150 US 118, 121 [1893]).Importantly, this rule applies even where a party is not required to produce any evidence or that type of evidence. [read post]