Search for: "Hughes v. Hughes"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 2,709
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2022, 9:47 am
Circuit Opinion in Atchley v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 9:00 am
We’ve previously discussed the Illinois appellate court’s 2013 decision in Fifield v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 1:38 pm
White’s ruling in National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 11:07 am
Rose Hughes shared the information. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 2:00 am
In Chudik V. [read post]
13 May 2016, 6:22 am
Hughes v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 8:36 am
Amarin Pharma, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 7:39 pm
University of Minnesota v. [read post]
16 Aug 2014, 5:37 am
Hughes, 1980 CanLII 23 (SCC), [1980] 2 S.C.R. 880, 114 D.L.R. (3d) 1, 14 C.C.L.T. 1. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 1:06 pm
Passing OffGuestKat Alex Woolgar summarised the short but sweet judgment from Lord Justice Floyd in Media Agency Group Limited and Transport Media Limited v Space Media Agency Limited and Ors [2019] EWCA Civ 712 that overturned a rather generous first instance finding of passing off through cybersquatting.Publications and General MattersAnnsley Merelle Ward provided a nice write-up in anticipation of a new IBIL publication entitled The Sir… [read post]
23 May 2021, 10:09 am
Ms Van Roy was represented by Nigel Tait, Helena Shipman and Katherine Hooley of Carter-Ruck, and Hugh Tomlinson QC and Aidan Wills of Matrix Chambers. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 6:28 am
Since statute is silent and Parliament has not defined the meaning of “precarious”, Lords Wilson, Carnwath, Hughes, Lloyd-Jones and Lady Black heard rival arguments about the correct construction of the term within the meaning of the Strasbourg jurisprudence. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 11:23 am
Hughes Supply, Inc. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
But as Hughes discovers, the truth is far more nuanced. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 9:34 am
On Friday, the Justices said they would accept Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 11:23 am
Hughes Supply, Inc. [read post]
31 May 2018, 11:18 am
In the majority opinion in Coleman v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 11:32 am
Here the court relied on the FDCA’s express preemption provision and rejected plaintiff’s reliance on Hughes v. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 7:52 pm
Ariad Pharm., Inc. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 7:18 am
What he must show is that the type or kind of injury was reasonably foreseeable: Hughes v. [read post]
