Search for: "Hughes v. State" Results 1401 - 1420 of 1,956
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2012, 11:32 am by Michelle Yeary
  Here the court relied on the FDCA’s express preemption provision and rejected plaintiff’s reliance on Hughes v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 10:44 am
OK, so the fundraising run-off between USC's John Campbell and Ohio State's Josh Mandel went Campbell's way, aided no doubt by the much larger donations of the 1% USCers who rallied to the Trojan cause.But that was only... [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 5:36 pm by Giorgio Buono
Here’s the programme (available for download on the registration page): Wednesday, 9 May 2012 (Venue: “Roma Tre” University - Aula Magna Rettorato, Via Ostiense 159) Registration (16,00-16,30) Opening session (16,30 – 16,45) Guido Fabiani, Rector, “Roma Tre” University Savino Mazzamuto, Secretary of State, Ministry of Justice, “Roma Tre” University The Europeanisation of private law: problems and perspectives (16,45-18,30)… [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 11:18 am by Jessica Mendelson
  Although the parties’ choice of law agreement generally governs which law is applied, in Hughes Electronics Corp. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 2:45 am
Here are the noteworthy posts of the week: Trade Secret and Covenant Not to Compete Posts, Cases and Articles:  In the latest high profile battle over which state's law should apply (i.e., California v. every other state), sports agent Aaron Mintz is battling his former employer Priority Sports & Entertainment over the enforceability of his non-compete. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:22 pm by Margaret Wood
Henry the Sixth in infant bands crowned King Whose state so many had the managing That they lost France and made his England bleed. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:03 pm
Due to a computer glitch on Friday, we couldn't receive donations in the Josh Mandel (Ohio State alum) v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 12:00 pm
If you live, as I do, in southern California, you are surrounded by USC alums and supporters. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 10:02 am by Michelle Yeary
Litig., 623 F.3d 1200, 1205-06 (8th Cir. 2010), and rejected the reasoning – which we also criticized – of the Fifth Circuit in Hughes v. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 10:55 pm by Wessen Jazrawi
Accessing politicians’ tax returns In more access to information commentary, Hugh Tomlinson QC on Inforrm has noted the freedom of expression dimension to the debate concerning the disclosure of politicians’ tax returns. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 5:35 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Well, that was an interesting set of perspectives; since I was already in a snarky mood, I couldn’t help but think in response to Kappos about what a lawyer might have said pre-NYT v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 2:16 am by Rachit Buch
Flood v Times: how does this affect calls for libel reform? [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 1:47 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Stangroom & Anor v Brown [2012] EWCA Civ 424 (04 April 2012) Foley Independent News & Media Ltd & Ors v Lord Ashcroft KCMG [2012] EWCA Civ 423 (04 April 2012) Salimi, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 422 (04 April 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Jeeg Global Ltd v Hare [2012] EWHC 871 (QB) (04 April 2012) Burn & Ors… [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:55 am by Geoffrey Rapp
Holthaus,, Jr., Note, Ed O’Bannon v. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 5:08 am by INFORRM
We note that Lord Phillips in Spiller v Joseph also doubted the need for this requirement…Any article 8 concerns are properly the subject of the law governing privacy, not defamation. [read post]