Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: T. S."
Results 1401 - 1420
of 182,339
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2010, 3:19 pm
It would be pointless for [W&T] to convert its overriding royalty interest into a working interest following the decommissioning of the Block 151 platform. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 9:43 am
” Yeah, that’s pretty telling—good science doesn’t pick and choose the data it reports. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 2:22 pm
"Two wrongs don't make a right, and you made a wrong move by throwing the rock. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 7:50 am
I don't know the facts of the Tower case. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 10:28 am
Brent T. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative Law Source: Justia September 16, 2011 Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n v. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 8:15 am
ShareJustice Brett Kavanaugh’s opinion for a unanimous court Thursday in Cantero v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 9:23 pm
Chicago Two New Books of interest: 1. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 11:46 am
[T]he lack of an express preemption provision covering claims like [plaintiff’s] does not necessarily mean Congress intended to preserve conflicting state law. [read post]
25 May 2011, 8:16 am
That’s a subject upon which we have, and will, resolutely decline comment. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 3:13 pm
Florida PharmacySolutions, Dkt 310, Case No.8:15-cv-178-T-23 (M.D. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 11:00 am
Interesting article in this week's Chronicle of Higher Education: All Rise. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 9:00 pm
Here's today's howler: "[I]t is challenging to confront vested interests, such as unions.... [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 10:37 am
But as he admits it’s possible he owes some amount of money, his best bet is to keep trying T-Mobile. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 10:22 pm
ZTE with a 50-euro royalty check being delivered to Huawei's counsel by hand), I don't think the patentee's royalty demand per se constitutes a point of reference. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 7:34 am
One particularly important procedural rule has to do with when parties, including public interest groups, can intervene in a case—and, in particular, when they can intervene when a government party is saying "no need, we've got this" and the groups are saying "no you don't. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 6:10 pm
" So the policy seems to be use force when no US interests are at stake and don't use force when US interests are at stake. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:45 pm
Sladek's participation in the review of the application would not have constituted a conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act's conflict of interest standards because Dr. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
This way they may feel confident in evaluating whether making use of such tools would be in their client’s best interests. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 6:05 pm
The key, however, is to tailor your company’s non-compete agreement to the business interests that allow the company to be competitive. [read post]