Search for: "In Re George" Results 1401 - 1420 of 8,519
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2011, 11:09 am by Editor
"Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service officials do not intend to rewrite regulations issued under tax code Section 409A but the agencies do want to hear about specific compliance problems that employers and practitioners have encountered, George Bostick, Treasury benefits tax counsel, said May 6. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 12:49 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
Until then, Espinoza said she has a message for the haters: “We’re going to continue to fight, to be prideful, to be visible, and to show out and pave the way. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 6:36 am
I don't even think we're supposed to watch. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 9:16 am by PaulKostro
In re Dodge, 50 N.J. 192, 216 (1967); see also Pascale v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 6:53 am by Patrick Parsons
 They certainly don’t sit around re-reading cases do they? [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 7:51 am
George Lenard, a lawyer specializing in labor and employment law, began the blog in May 2003 as a result of his online reading about employment law. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 5:00 am
They're going to use people's money and time against them. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 5:00 am
They're going to use people's money and time against them. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 5:00 am
They're going to use people's money and time against them. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 5:00 am
They're going to use people's money and time against them. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 4:23 pm by Norm Pattis
But, if you're ever pressed, 'Why did you vote that way? [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 2:00 am
"Ryan is gone but his family and myself, we're the ones serving life sentences. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 5:53 am by Gritsforbreakfast
However, an independent arbitrator ruled in June that the charges of charges of dishonesty and excessive force could not be substantiated, and Police Chief Howard Williams was bound by law to re-instate him.But a June memo from Tibbe to Williams says that due to Stephens’ “history for dishonesty,” her office will be unable to call Stephens as a witness in any case and cannot prosecute any case in which he is an investigating officer. [read post]