Search for: "In re April B." Results 1401 - 1420 of 3,287
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2019, 12:00 pm by Dan Flynn
   “We acknowledge receipt of your responses sent via email on March 7, 2019, and April 1, 2019. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:45 am
This April 5, 2010 amendment to AB2000 seeks to add a medical exemption clause for sick dogs in designated rabies areas. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 1:06 pm by K&L Gates
  The Subcommittee also recommends that the proposed language be largely re-written and that the rule be divided into four parts. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 12:25 pm
In addition, non-California residents who purchased their iPads outside of California lacked standing to assert claims under the statutes.The purchasers’ claims under the California consumer protection statutes were dismissed with leave to amend.The July 18 opinion in In re Apple and AT&T iPad Unlimited Data Plan Litigation will be reported at CCH Advertising Law Guide ¶64,337.Further information regarding CCH Advertising Law Guide appears here. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 8:31 am by Dennis Crouch
The patents are 5,966,702, 6,061,520, 6,125,447 & RE 38,104 – related to the Java platform. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 12:37 pm by Steve Hall
Rhode Island doesn’t have the death penalty.The full panel will hear the case on April 4. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 10:31 am
But the oath is prescribed in Article II to be taken "[b]efore he enter on the Execution of his Office. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 7:26 am by Sonya Hubbard
Given Dooley’s new employment agreement, we suspect the number will be even higher come next April’s proxy. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 2:47 pm
Levy responding to RIAA cross-motionExhibit M-May 9, 2006, RIAA Email transmitting first draft of Hard Drive stipulationExhibit N-April 7, 2006, RIAA Email apologizing for delay in responding re Hard Drive inspectionExhibit 0-December 20, 2007, objection by defendant to RIAA expert submitting 5th version of report containing new matterExhibit P-Errata Sheet accompanying deposition transcript of Yannick Raymond-WrightExhibit Q-Ars Technica eye witness report of RIAA lawyers… [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 9:00 am by Don Cruse
POKALA, M.D., D/B/A NACOGDOCHES CARDIAC CENTER, No. 13-0209 Petition filed on April 24, 2013 The Court originally denied review of this petition last August. [read post]
5 May 2009, 2:52 am
In re Thor Tech, Inc., Serial No. 78634024 (April 22, 2009) [precedential].Of course, the Board found the marks to be "virtually identical," and it observed for the umpteen hundredth time that as a result a lesser degree of similarity between the involved goods is necessary to support a finding of likely confusion.Thor Tech argued that the goods at issue are different because its application is directed to recreational vehicles whereas the registered mark concerns… [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 5:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Burke PC v Aezah 2017 NY Slip Op 32670(U) December 14, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 654778/2016 Judge: David B. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 10:06 am by Georgialee Lang
Morales sole guardianship, sole parental responsibilities, and primary residence of the child on an interim basis; (b) requiring Ms. [read post]
7 May 2018, 11:02 pm by Gordon Firemark
On April 30, 2018, California Supreme Court rendered its decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 10:12 am by Ron Coleman
  And, once again, they’re shooting for the Principal Register over at Breath of Hope, Incorporated. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 5:56 pm by Kevin O'Keefe
Re: Unethical advertising on your firm’s part Hi A… and B… You, or someone on your behalf, is posting spam comments on my blog in an effort to promote/advertise your website. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 3:15 am
Congratulations, and welcome to the First World of Banking, B  of C! [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:56 pm by Jerri Lynn Ward, J.D.
Adopted Rule Reviews In the April 6, 2012, issue of the Texas Register, the Board of Nursing filed a Notice of Intent to review and consider for re-adoption, revision, or repeal the following chapters (See the Texas Register): Chapter 213, Practice and Procedure, §§213.1 – 213.34. [read post]