Search for: "In v. United States" Results 1401 - 1420 of 102,779
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2008, 10:23 am
Kaczmarek v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions Court of Appeal “A citizen of a European Union member state who had no right to live in the United Kingdom under domestic or European law, even though she was lawfully present, was not eligible for income support. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 1:58 am by sally
Patel and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 741; [2012] WLR (D) 174 “The decision of the Secretary of State for the Home Department to refuse an extension of leave to remain in the United Kingdom was not invalidated by the fact that she had made no removal direction in respect of the applicant at the same time as or shortly after the refusal of the extension application.” WLR Daily, 1st June 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 1:34 am
Regina (Shields) v Secretary of State for Justice Queen’s Bench Divisional Court “The Secretary of State for Justice did have power and jurisdiction to consider granting a pardon under the Royal Prerogative in respect of a person convicted and sentenced in a foreign court but transferred to the United Kingdom to serve his sentence. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 1:58 am by sally
Patel and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 741; [2012] WLR (D) 174 “The decision of the Secretary of State for the Home Department to refuse an extension of leave to remain in the United Kingdom was not invalidated by the fact that she had made no removal direction in respect of the applicant at the same time as or shortly after the refusal of the extension application.” WLR Daily, 1st June 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
15 May 2014, 12:05 pm by Wells Bennett
The AUMF provides authority to detain these individuals within the United States and transfer them out of the United States. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 1:55 pm by Orin S. Kerr
Last October, I wrote a long post on a new Tenth Circuit decision, United States v. [read post]