Search for: "John Doe, Inc." Results 1401 - 1420 of 5,554
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2010, 3:21 am by John L. Welch
I would have given Useful the benefit of the doubt on this one.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
17 Dec 2006, 3:12 pm
Applicant lamely contended that "'LOV' does not sound like 'LOVE' as the 'O' in 'LOVE' is pronounced as 'luv' (having a short 'U' sound) and the 'O' in 'LOV' has a short 'O' vowel sound ... and 'JOY' does not sound like 'JOI.'" The Board was not in love with that argument, and its response gave little joy to Applicant. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 12:01 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the Dec. 4 conference) Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:45 am by Sheldon Toplitt
John Does 1-25 (Case No. 2:10-cv-1275-DAK) cited First Amendment safeguards for unidentified environmental advocates who used the Internet to perpetrate a media hoax on plaintiff Koch Industries, Inc., as the basis for dismissing the company's lawsuit against the anonymous jokesters.In an 18-page memorandum of decision and order, U.S. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 9:17 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Friday’s cases. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 4:30 am by Ray Dowd
Broadcasting Co., Inc., 438 Fed Appx 587 [9th Cir 2011]Further, this case does not involve a highly technical area of expertise. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 5:44 am by Ray Mullman
He also found that a group of real-estate investors had formed a company called National Senior Care Inc. in order to purchase the publicly traded Mariner Health Care Inc. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 12:11 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCivil PracticeDespite Claims of 'Distressing' Nature, Plaintiffs Cannot Sue as 'Does,' Must Be Named on Caption Doe v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 2:04 pm
Iowa May Tax Royalties to Out-of-State Franchisor Having No Physical Presence in StateThis posting was written by John W. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 12:52 pm by John Elwood
(John Elwood) The government’s February 2010 cert. petition in United States v. [read post]