Search for: "KELLY v. STATE" Results 1401 - 1420 of 2,337
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2014, 4:17 am
Many states have legal rules that call for religious exemptions from generally applicable state and local laws.[49] Some such rules are enacted by statute, using so-called “Religious Freedom Restoration Acts. [read post]
11 May 2020, 3:24 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The Washington Post, Leah Litman writes that Kelly v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 3:36 am
Contrary to the motion court's conclusion, plaintiffs cannot show that the defendants in the underlying action created the allegedly dangerous condition by an affirmative act of misfeasance (see Mercer v City of New York, 88 NY2d 955, 670 N.E.2d 443, 647 N.Y.S.2d 159 [1996]; Kelly v Berberich, 36 AD3d 475, 476-477, 828 N.Y.S.2d 332 [2007]), [**2] and the claim that said defendants failed to maintain the garage sign that was purportedly the instrumentality that… [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 1:38 am
CGL - LATE NOTICE - GOOD FAITH BELIEF IN NON-LIABILITY - 14-MONTH DELAY - REASONABLE POSSIBILITY OF THE POLICY'S INVOLVEMENTPonok Realty Corp. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 1:30 am by Sherica Celine
He also defends companies in state consumer protection investigations and data breach responses. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 1:04 pm by Giles Peaker
Del Rio Sanchez v Simple Properties Management Limited. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:30 am
”Oregon is one of only five states that still offers a veteran home loan program. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 2:57 pm by William Appleton
  Peter Marguiles analyzed the Fifth Circuit’s Oct. 5 ruling in Texas v. [read post]