Search for: "Kerr v. Kerr"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 2,070
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2008, 10:26 am
Kerr-McGee Chemical Corp., 999 F. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 4:52 am
Please let us know if any of the information below is inaccurate or if we have omitted any relevant cases: Supreme Court Cases PNM v Times Newspapers,17 and 18 January 2017 – (Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lords Kerr, Clarke, Wilson, Sumption, Reed). [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 3:37 pm
By Ethan Ackerman with comments from Eric U.S. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 6:27 am
Bennett, consolidated with McComish v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 8:35 am
Lord Kerr noted in particular the procedural arrangements as set out in the Act and the suggestion that service may be postal. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:23 pm
Others much more qualified than I have analyzed the debate, so see these folks for much meatier, more lawyerly analyses:Orin Kerr, Volokh Conspiracy: "Reflections on the Oral Argument in United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 1:00 am
The hand down panel will be Lord Mance, Lord Kerr and Lord Hughes. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 7:48 pm
Moreover, all industries depending on electronic signatures should focus on security procedures to preempt the argument that the electronic signatures they collect do not in fact belong to their system users.The case is Kerr v. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 1:39 am
Supreme Court The appeal will be heard today by a panel of five judges comprising Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr and Lord Toulson. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 7:03 am
Lord Wilson gave the leading judgment; Lord Kerr, Lady Hale and Lord Clarke agreed with him. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 1:45 am
The majority judgment was given by Lord Hamblen and Lord Leggatt with whom Lord Kerr agreed. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 11:27 am
The appeals in Her Majesty’s Advocate v Ambrose, Her Majesty’s Advocate v G, Her Majesty’s Advocate v M and Her Majesty’s Advocate v P will be heard over three days commencing on Tuesday 28 June 2011 by Lords Hope, Brown, Kerr, Dyson and Clarke (Scotland). [read post]
14 May 2018, 1:00 am
The hand down panel will be Lord Kerr, Lord Sumption and Lord Carnwath. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 3:42 am
See United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 3:55 am
At Reason’s Volokh Conspiracy blog (via How Appealing), Orin Kerr offers some reactions to the oral argument. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 4:14 am
” At Reason’s Volokh Conspiracy blog, Orin Kerr offers his take on why the plaintiffs in Frank v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 3:09 am
See Orin Kerr on Volokh Conspiracy. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 8:09 am
This week, the UK Supreme Court refused permission to appeal in the matter of Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union v Wightman and others. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 2:00 am
The proposed panel for hand down is Lord Kerr, Lady Arden and Lord Kitchin. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 2:44 am
In the case of R (on the application of Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police ([2020] EWCA Civ 1058) the Court of Appeal held that the live automated facial recognition technology (“AFR”) used by the South Wales Police Force (“SWP”) was unlawful as it was not “in accordance with law” for the purposes of Article 8 of the ECHR. [read post]
