Search for: "Kerr v. State"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 1,614
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2018, 10:53 am
Of particular note, he expressed misgivings in Henry, and then again in 2008 (United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 8:06 am
The United Kingdom Supreme Court judgment authorising Assange’s extradition to Sweden Carl Gardner: Lord Kerr on the Assange case Carl Gardner: Supreme Court judgment: Assange v Swedish Judicial Authority Carl Gardner: Could Assange apply to set aside the Supreme Court judgment? [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 8:38 pm
See State v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 11:48 am
See State v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 11:48 am
See State v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 5:22 am
’ Coolidge v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 11:00 am
UNITED STATES v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 11:09 am
Facebook v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 6:04 pm
For example, in Facebook v. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:00 pm
Kerr stated in her factum, the “approach enunciated in Pettkus v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:41 am
It is of course open to member states to provide for rights more generous than those guaranteed by the Convention, but such provision should not be the product of interpretation of the Convention by national courts, since the meaning of the Convention should be uniform throughout the states party to it. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 4:11 pm
Switzerland Swiss local reports that the Swiss Federal Court has held that clicking “like” on Facebook on hateful content could amount to a crime United States The US has recently tightened regulations over Chinese state media. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 2:11 pm
We have seen the Northern Irish Supreme Court Justice Lord Kerr suggesting that Article 3 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child ought to be directly applicable, and the Supreme Court applying it in Mathieson v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2015] UKSC 47 (8 July 2015). [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 8:30 am
As Wikipedia explains, “The United States district courts are the general trial courts of the United States federal court system. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8] Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:55 am
Global Process Systems v Syarikat Takaful Malaysia Berhad [2011] UKSC 5. [read post]
7 Nov 2024, 8:19 am
Baker v. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 6:00 am
Wells informed us that in Hatim v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 2:59 pm
Recently, in Citizens United v. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 1:11 pm
Re (@RichardMRe) October 2, 2022 Relatedly, there are Rick Pildes's and Orin Kerr's earlier posts about the concept of judicial courage. [read post]
