Search for: "Land v. United States"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 6,678
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2011, 4:53 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 12:30 pm
The Appeals Court had a momentous decision to make in Killorin v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 11:35 am
On the front page of Nossaman's website, we report on the result of decisions by the United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit and the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii that allow the construction of a 20-mile, $5 billion, rail transit project to proceed. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 7:16 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 8:00 am
In her recent concurring opinion in United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 6:18 am
The Cowlitz tribe entered into failed treaty negotiations with the United States in 1855, but according to the DOI and the D.C. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:34 am
Here is the opinion in United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 3:05 pm
In another case, Snowball West Investments, L.P. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 2:55 am
After the Elk v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 1:13 am
In the case of McDonald v Rappaport et al, Judge Tauro of the United States District Court of Massachusetts, found that the International House of Pancakes is not a fast food restaurant. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 4:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 10:59 am
"), United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 10:44 am
Board of Education of Ewing, Lyng v. [read post]
Tribal Court Dismisses Trespass Charges Against Members Holding Religious Ceremony To Block Pipeline
8 Jul 2022, 4:05 am
" Here defendants had the right to hold religious ceremonies (with invited guests) on land ceded to the United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 10:08 am
United States (Fed. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 4:13 pm
United States (Fed.Cir. 2000) 220 F.3d at 1368). [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 3:01 pm
United States Bureau of Land Management, Case No. 08-178-M-DWM, in the U.S. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 7:15 am
Rodriguez cites, among other cases, United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 3:21 pm
The definition of "waters of the United States" will apply to the entire Act, but the EPA may retain broader authority to regulate traditional polluting activities on lands not otherwise subject to CWA jurisdiction given the Court's prior holding in County of Maui v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 9:20 am
Because the federal government has defined the “waters of the United States” to include wetlands. [read post]
