Search for: "Line v. People" Results 1401 - 1420 of 13,519
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2009, 12:00 pm
  See, e.g., Anonymous Commenter  #11  v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 6:33 am by MBettman
Three people in the bar ended up dead, and two others seriously wounded in the resulting gunfire. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 11:20 pm by V.Venkatesan
The Supreme Court is currently hearing on guidelines for encounters, in the case of People's Union of Liberties v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 7:35 am
  In order to be able to stop other people using the idea (without asking the person who first had it) the idea must have been new, and must not have been too easy for other people (even people who knew a lot about the area of the idea) to have arrived at, at the time when we first asked to be allowed to stop other people from using it without asking. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm by David S. Kemp
In this column, I explore a different criticism, one that has often been voiced by people who support Roe’s bottom line: that the Court in Roe went too far, too fast. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 12:08 pm by Jim Gerl
  People continue to cite unpublished decisions. [read post]
13 May 2013, 2:43 pm
  According the Dictionary of Canadian Law, lineal consanguinity is defined as, “The relationship which exists between people descended from each other in a line, e.g. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 11:25 am by Derek Muller
Early litigation focused on the equal protection clause, a nod to the “one person, one vote” line of cases after Baker v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 12:36 pm by Christine Hurt
  I have expressed those concerns" before returning to the line of questioning. [read post]