Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 3,574
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2013, 5:58 am
I HATE THE LORD GOD FOR GIVING YOU LIFE!!!!!!!!! [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 7:46 am
As Lord Diplock put it in Attorney General v Leveller Magazine Limited [1979] AC 440 at 450A to C. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 4:01 pm
He referred to the speech of Lord Nicholls in Tse Wai Chun Paul v Albert Cheng [2001] E.M.L.R. 31. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm
The trial in TLT and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department began on Monday 20 June 2016 and was completed on 23 June, with judgment being given on 24 June 2016. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 5:16 am
Dissenting on this issue, Lord Carnwath would have allowed the defence of counterm [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:52 am
But it's also a reminder to not expect too much of United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 7:30 pm
Such was the story in Actavis v Lilly. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 1:46 am
Lord Briggs and Lord Hamblen gave the judgment, with which the other members of the Court agreed. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 3:15 pm
I was scanning the Court of Appeal judgments, waiting for White v Knowsley, when this came up: London & Quadrant Housing Trust v Ansell [2007] EWCA Civ 326 Now that is interesting. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:53 am
Lord Justice Neuberger (as he then was) commented that "it is not entirely easy to justify this" (Akici v LR Butlin [2005] EWCA Civ 1296). [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:53 am
Lord Justice Neuberger (as he then was) commented that "it is not entirely easy to justify this" (Akici v LR Butlin [2005] EWCA Civ 1296). [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 1:19 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 1:00 am
The proposed panel for hand down is Lord Reed, Lord Sumption and Lord Hodge. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:09 am
Foskett J observed that no feature of the Strasbourg jurisprudence has gone so far as to impose the kind of obligation contended for in this case and that it is not open to the domestic courts to move ahead of the European Court of Human Rights in this regard (invoking the principle in R (Ullah) v Special Adjudicator [2004] 2 AC 323), a principle which has found further expression in Regina (Al-Skeini and others) v Secretary of State for Defence [2008] 1 AC 153… [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 8:09 am
”) Lord Kerr, like Stephens J at first instance, noted that that was not an immutable requirement as the ECtHR had stated in Mocanu v Romania (10865/09) (2015) 60 EHRR 19 (Paras 107-108 of Lord Kerr’s judgment) and as the Supreme Court had found in McCaughey’s case (See paras 118, 119 and, in particular, 139 of McCaughey’s case). [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 6:35 am
He said that his hand were tied as The scope of the Convention jurisdiction within the meaning of Article 1 has been addressed by the Grand Chamber of the ECtHR in Bankovic, and by the House of Lords and the Supreme Court respectively in Al-Skeini and Smith v Oxfordshire. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 1:00 am
The proposed panel for hand-down is Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson, Lord Carnwath, and Lady Arden. [read post]
26 May 2010, 9:31 am
The property was originally built for Lord MacNaghten. [read post]
26 May 2010, 9:31 am
The property was originally built for Lord MacNaghten. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:07 pm
In the case of Aitken v DPP ([2015] EWHC 1079 (Admin)) the Divisional Court dismissed a former editor’s appeal against a conviction for publishing a story which breached an anonymity order under section 39 of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933. [read post]
