Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 4,049
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2016, 2:28 am
Lord Wilson have the leading judgment, with which Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lord Reed and Lord Toulson agree. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 3:13 am
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12–14 January 2016. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 2:05 am
The Bill is currently going through the House of Lords where new amendments are being debated. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:54 pm
Consider, for example, Riggs v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 4:42 am
With reference to judicial inconsistency on a point of disclosure in the judgment of Vernon v Bosley , Lord Neuberger then demonstrated that litigation best practice had in some areas been left in a “state of complete uncertainty”. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:22 am
Arnold J considered the criteria set down by the Court of Appeal in Novartis v Hospira [2013], but noted that it was of concern that Lord Hoffman’s judgment in the Privy Council case National Commercial Bank Jamaica v Olint [2009] had not been cited. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 1:30 am
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12–14 January 2016. [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm
The Press Gazette reports on the House of Lords debate on the Investigatory Powers Bill, noting suggestions that the Bill could put journalists and their sources in danger. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 3:52 am
In the case of Forster v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Ors [2016] the owner of the George Tavern in Stepney appealed against the grant of planning permission for a 3 story residential building on the site of a former night club next door. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 3:52 am
In the case of Forster v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Ors [2016] the owner of the George Tavern in Stepney appealed against the grant of planning permission for a 3 story residential building on the site of a former night club next door. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 4:15 pm
Lord Carnwath dissented here and stated that he would prefer to reserve his position on question 3 as it did not need deciding. [read post]
Blocking orders against ISPs to combat trade-mark infringement legal says Court of Appeal in Cartier
12 Jul 2016, 6:28 am
This duty is one which will, if necessary, be enforced in equity by way of injunction: see Upmann v. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm
Last week the Daily Mail published a clarification about the article which said: “An article published on May 26 described Lord Sugar as a ‘spiv’. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 4:13 pm
When the Reynolds defence was first decided, in the first few cases after the decision was handed down, the defence failed and had to go all the way back up to the House of Lords for the judges of the House of Lords to say to lower courts you are not getting it. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 1:44 pm
By stating the requirement to be “cogent” evidence that there is a sound basis for hope for the future, the standard is pitched at a realistic level. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 4:04 am
" The judge also noted [still at para 54] how, in light of the decision of the House of Lords in CBS Songs v Amstrad, the ISPs do not owe a common law duty of care [readers who follow the current EU policy debate will note that, while this may be true under common law, the same may be less so or become increasingly less so at the EU level] to Richemont to take reasonable care to ensure that their services are not used by the operators of… [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 2:13 am
Lord Kerr gave the only judgment. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 10:40 am
Supreme Court In a leapfrog appeal, the Supreme Court, comprising Lady Hale and Lords Kerr, Sumption, Hughes and Toulson, heard submissions on 26 and 27 January 2016. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 1:45 am
The panel will be Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lord Sumption, Lord Hughes and Lord Toulson. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 1:39 am
Supreme Court The appeal will be heard today by a panel of five judges comprising Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr and Lord Toulson. [read post]
