Search for: "MATTER OF A W A V" Results 1401 - 1420 of 8,370
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm by Wolfgang Demino
To survive a motion to dismiss, a complaint must "contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, `to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.'" Ashcroft v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In the matter of AR (Children) (Scotland), heard 13 May 2015. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In the matter of D (A child), heard on 23 May 2016. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:31 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In the matter of AR (Children) (Scotland), heard 13 May 2015. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 7:32 am by Charles Chevalier
In reversing, and citing last year’s en banc decision in Therasense, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In the matter of an application by Jason Loughlin for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 20 Jun 2017. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 8:01 am by David Smith
First, strictly temporally, is David Smith's version, followed by Dave's]Whittaker v Kinnear [2011] EWHC 1479 (QB)This case raises some interesting questions about estoppel and sale.K sold her property and it’s grounds to W and his business associate, Mr Nichols in 2007, apparently because she could no longer afford it. [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 2:36 pm by familoo
See A and B v Rotherham MBC [2014] EWFC 47 Fam. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In the matter of an application by JR55 for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 8-9 March 2016. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 5:19 am by Aidan Wills, Matrix
Nor did Janowiec v Russia (2013) App nos. 55508/07 and 29520/09 assist the claimant. [read post]
23 May 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Monday 23 May 2016 the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of In the matter of D (A child) regarding whether there is a fundamental principle of procedure in England and Wales that a child must be given an “opportunity to be heard” in every disputed custody case, and whether the Romanian Court of Appeal breached that principle by not giving the child, D, such an opportunity. [read post]