Search for: "MATTER OF C M R"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 2,967
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2015, 9:00 pm
In Case C-49/12, Sunico, the ECJ held that the concept of “civil and commercial matters” within the meaning of Article 1 of Regulation Brussels I covers an action whereby a public authority of one Member State claims, as against persons resident in another Member State, damages for loss caused by a tortious conspiracy to commit value added tax fraud in the first Member State. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:42 pm
Testator M died August 9, 1975 leaving his widow S as his sole distributee. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 2:14 pm
[NB: I’m not sure I agree w/the TM example. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 12:13 pm
By Amanda M. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 4:29 am
C. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 4:00 am
The most-consulted French-language decision was R. c. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:07 am
The O’Connor Case A recent decision by Albany County Commercial Division Justice Richard M. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2015) Professor James Stewart, of the Faculty of Law at the University of British Columbia, has produced a valuable on line symposium: Business and Human Rights: Next Steps. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 11:00 am
LAUREN R. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 11:00 am
LAUREN R. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 12:35 am
But at least as a legal matter, the factual basis of the three guilty pleas seems pretty uncontroversial. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
In the context of these related matters, the parties executed two stipulations, parts of which are pertinent to the present matter. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 5:13 am
That's pretty much what Justice Thomas just did to the 6th Circuit.On Monday, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in M&G Polymers USA LLC v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 10:10 pm
Five Things to Know About the Florida Medical Marijuana Act of 2015 Florida Medical Marijuana Complete Text of Proposed 2015 LawThe new law proposed in Florida may be known as “The Florida Medical Marijuana Act. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Jenifer M. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 4:32 am
I’m not. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 10:28 am
As a general matter, there’s no reason to expect government officials to be filled with self-doubt about any such rules. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:17 am
What did one of the world’s most prestigious appellate courts do to cause such red-facedness in the redoubtable Professor M? [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 2:25 am
Timothy R. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 5:30 pm
Dambreville of Obermayer on the firm’s blog, Family Matters Update to the JOBS Act? [read post]
