Search for: "MATTER OF H C R"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 1,509
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2009, 1:23 pm
Matter of Eli H. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 4:06 am
Dec. 30, 2008)(Unpub)Black worker flips dismissal, on FRCP 56(c) procedural grounds, of his Title VII claim of workplace harassment; evidence includes mock noose-lynching conductCommentary on previously reported Federal Appellate Court decisions1st Cir.Arbitration Agreement Precludes Title VII CasePelliter v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 1:33 pm
John H. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 12:13 am
Plaintiffs James H. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 1:10 pm
R. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 11:00 pm
In 1996 she was the first person of color honored with the Vernon C. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 4:51 pm
” Nonetheless, the court expressed its expectation that defendants would ensure plaintiff’s expert understood how the system worked, what searches it could run, and how the results would be produced, and that defendants would answer any questions the expert might have. h. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 9:26 am
To grant options for the sale of any property of the estate or trust for a period not exceeding six months; h. [read post]
26 Oct 2008, 4:53 pm
See, p.41 and Appendix C of FAA Benefit Cost Analysis Guidance. [read post]
26 Oct 2008, 5:58 am
On May 13, 2008, during the annual meeting of Overstock.com shareholders, Audit Committee Chairperson Allison H. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 9:03 am
§ §341, 343(b), 343(c), 343(d), 343(e), 343(f), 343(g), 343(h), 343(i), 343(k), 343(q), or 343(r)) relating to food.Drug and device companies don't have that problem, which - as we explained in our prior post - is why the California Supreme Court had to jump through all the hoops it did to avoid preemption.So with this point in mind, we look at the defendants' certiorari petition in Albertsons/Farm Raised Salmon. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 5:33 pm
Walter C. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IAM) Lost knowledge (IP Spotlight) Nobel Prize winning physicist R B Laughlin explains how IP damages innovation (Techdirt) US v China IP case before the World Trade Organisation - differing news on who won or lost (EXCESS COPYRIGHT) (Chinese Law Prof Blog) WIPO Assemblies conclude (WIPO) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Intellectual Property Watch) Global – Trade Marks / Brands Trade mark marking strategy - R and TM… [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 5:45 pm
Donald H. [read post]
13 Sep 2008, 11:21 am
G.L. c. 6, § § 178E, 178K(2). [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 7:57 pm
R. 25 Civ. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 12:16 pm
See R. 2:12-3(b). [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 8:57 am
As a practical matter, though, the Board might decide informally that certain people would take the lead. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 5:06 pm
MOREHEAD, VAUGHN R. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 11:49 pm
Partner Eric D. [read post]
