Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 42,191
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2011, 12:13 pm
“What the rule does is afford the hearing officer the ability to limit evidence and litigation of issues concerning who is eligible to vote in the election,” Fritts said. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 10:57 am
Although the Court excludes evidence all the time, a Court majority probably despises the exclusionary rule while almost never thinking about it. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 6:41 am
In Scott, the Third Circuit reiterated these principles and held that district courts must impose some form of sanction for any Rule 11 violation, no matter how insubstantial the violation – a characteristic unique to the application of Rule 11 in PSLRA cases. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 6:41 am
In Scott, the Third Circuit reiterated these principles and held that district courts must impose some form of sanction for any Rule 11 violation, no matter how insubstantial the violation – a characteristic unique to the application of Rule 11 in PSLRA cases. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 6:41 am
In Scott, the Third Circuit reiterated these principles and held that district courts must impose some form of sanction for any Rule 11 violation, no matter how insubstantial the violation – a characteristic unique to the application of Rule 11 in PSLRA cases. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 11:18 am
The witness promptly answered that such a person would not be truthful.As to the Rule 404(b) evidence, the Third Circuit ruled it admissible on a theory that deceptive conduct in similar matters close in time to the alleged fraudulent conduct is admissible to prove intent. [read post]
9 May 2009, 5:35 am
In a 3-2 decision, an appellate court reversed, holding that “the evidence failed as a matter of law to overcome the presumption against suicide. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 1:03 am
"While we continue to believe that there is more than enough evidence in the record to establish our claim that BNA is in fact Argentina’s alter ego, we understand the court’s ruling in this matter," said the plaintiff’s counsel Carlos Gonzalez, from Diaz Reus & Targ LLP. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
The appellate court ruled that the defendants in this matter had failed to identify proposed witnesses and a link to any evidence to be provided by the witnesses relative to the defense's claim of hardship in regards to the Plaintiff's choice of forum and the issue of venue.Accordingly, the trial court decision was reversed and the case was remanded.Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this LINK. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 5:18 am
Instead, what emerged during the probe was evidence of a mismanaged bureaucracy enforcing rules about tax-exemption applications it didn't understand, according to the law-enforcement officials....With this year's midterm elections heating up, the FBI's decision will feed both parties' stories about why—or whether—the IRS scandal mattered. ... [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 4:12 pm
This is known as the “plain meaning” rule. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 5:40 am
As a practical matter, that’s a pretty important question. [read post]
18 Jun 2016, 5:37 am
And that’s where the Texas Supreme Court’s analysis happens: Sure, the Court ruled, you can stop the State from using your car as evidence against you in a criminal trial. [read post]
10 May 2017, 3:00 am
” Given that the plaintiff could potentially recover over $5 million, the Tenth Circuit ruled that federal jurisdiction was proper. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 1:22 pm
As expected, the trial court judge ruled that the Plaintiff's attorney would not bring this up in front of a jury as it was impeachment on a collateral matter. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 6:21 pm
The Review also maintains the free Federal Evidence Blog, which highlights recent cases and issues involving the Federal Rules of Evidence and other topical evidence matters. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 12:42 pm
“Hearsay is not admissible except as provided by [the Rules of Evidence] or by other law. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 8:11 pm
In both opinions, the OTA ruled in favor of the California Franchise Tax Board, holding each taxpayer failed to meet its respective burden to substantiate the R&D tax credit claimed. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:26 pm
Indeed, in assessing the fourth prong, courts should consider whether the matter can be proved adequately by other evidence. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:37 am
IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF D.J., N.D.R., AND N.R., App. [read post]
