Search for: "Matter of Goods" Results 1401 - 1420 of 96,963
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2024, 4:25 am by SHG
So too did Bibi Netanyahu, as if he gets a vote in the matter. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 12:04 am by Mark Keenan
This is the clear pro or benefit of doing it yourself, but is it a good idea for everyone? [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
do—a response that merely identifies arguments on both sides (generally a good thing to do, as explained below) but that never resolves these competing arguments to arrive at (and defend) a bottom line, is not fully answering the question asked (and is thus not likely to receive full or near-full credit).For example, if a question asks: “Does the court have subject-matter jurisdiction over the case as described? [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 4:24 pm by Ilya Somin
That's both good for them, and a way to enable them to make greater contributions to our economy and society. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 2:51 pm by Herrman & Herrman, P.L.L.C.
It’s important to keep our dogs away from strangers no matter how friendly we think our pets may be. [read post]
The rule does not apply to non-competes entered into pursuant to a bona fide sale of a business entity and provides a good faith exception for employers who enforce or attempt to enforce a non-compete where good faith basis exists to believe that the rule is inapplicable. [read post]
The rule does not apply to non-competes entered into pursuant to a bona fide sale of a business entity and provides a good faith exception for employers who enforce or attempt to enforce a non-compete where good faith basis exists to believe that the rule is inapplicable. [read post]
The rule does not apply to non-competes entered into pursuant to a bona fide sale of a business entity and provides a good faith exception for employers who enforce or attempt to enforce a non-compete where good faith basis exists to believe that the rule is inapplicable. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 12:28 pm by Eugene Volokh
"Antisemitic declarations" are protected by the First Amendment; if City University of New York professors signed a letter defending students who supported the Hamas attacks—or for that matter defending the Hamas attacks themselves—I think CUNY couldn't discipline the professors consistent with the First Amendment (see Levin v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:30 am by Jocelyn Bosse
This reward is subject to the principle of exhaustion and the fundamental freedom of movements of goods, i.e. the second fundamental freedom of EU Treaty, which cannot be derogated. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am by admin
Martin Wells set out to do a meta-analysis, which was all fine and good. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 10:25 am by David Bernstein
Consistently applied, such institutional neutrality would be generally good policy, so long as it does not clash with civil rights laws. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:23 am
"... even if the message were coded, as in a bunch of people quietly holding up MAGA signs or wearing T-shirts saying 'All Lives Matter.' And besides, calling all this peaceful stretches the use of the word rather implausibly. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Jordan Furlong
… There is a lack of engagement with regulatory matters and the Society is too involved in responding to the interests of the legal profession. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 12:39 pm by David M. Ward
It doesn’t matter what it is, or how big it is, only that it’s something you would like to get done. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 12:28 pm by Jennifer Goddard
The truth is, those operational efficiencies only really matter when you have enough sales volume to warrant streamlining. [read post]