Search for: "Matter of T."
Results 1401 - 1420
of 161,902
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2018, 11:17 pm
The view that the claimed subject-matter did not involve an inventive step was reiterated. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
When a claim relating to an electronic gaming apparatus defines as an integer a game rule which provides a further technical effect (which may be known) in the sense of decision T 1173/97, which technical effect is an inherent result of implementing the rule in the apparatus, should that integer be taken into account in assessing inventive step? [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 6:13 pm
It’s easy to say that safe havens don’t matter if everywhere is a safe haven. [read post]
6 May 2009, 6:23 pm
I think the faith/corporate law link matters to corporate law for at least two reasons. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 3:05 pm
The arguments must be clearly and concisely presented to enable the board (and the other party or parties) to understand immediately why the decision is alleged to be incorrect, and on what facts the appellant bases its arguments, without first having to make investigations of their own. [2.3] Moreover it is also established case law that grounds sufficient for the admissibility of an appeal must be analysed in detail vis-à-vis the main reasons given for the contested decision (see T… [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 3:02 pm
The decision T 587/98, therefore, is not considered to be particularly relevant to the present case. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 10:58 am
Which is why the renowned John T. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 1:29 pm
But it could also matter for ordinary damages. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 2:56 pm
” It interpreted Hayes’ holding as meaning that “[d]espite the existence of Rule 60(b)(5), this court indicated ‘[t]here is no statutory authority for modifying an order of equitable distribution. [read post]
9 May 2012, 12:35 pm
Mere disagreement, even impassioned disagreement, doesn’t count. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 1:28 am
(if selecting from convergent lists) (T 1621/16) (March 2020)Adding matter by cherry-picking from separate embodiments: Philip Morris v BAT ([2023] EWHC 2616 (Pat)) (Oct 2023)Defining what the invention is not can be as important as defining what the invention is (T 0273/22, Chimeric antibodies/REGENERON) (Nov 2023)The criteria for the novelty and inventive step of pharmaceutical selection inventions (T 1356/21) (Dec 2023)Image credit: DALLE-3 [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 4:03 am
The complaints of users of tiny screen phones that the bigger screens aren't "comfortable" in their hands doesn't pass the smell test. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 4:49 am
I tried to leave a note on that page, but couldn't. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 11:55 am
MACASKILL: I don’t think so.COWEN: Why not? [read post]
28 May 2012, 5:01 pm
According to other decisions (T 314/99 [5.1 to 5.6]) or T 186/01 [4]), a document did not become publicly available by its mere arrival in the archive of a library. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 8:14 am
G 1/03 and G 2/10 relate to different cases, so cannot prima facie be considered as somehow conflicting, but Board 3.3.09 made the currently pending referral G 1/16 while handling appeal T 0437/14 asking a.o. whether the G 2/10 decision effects how some aspects of G 1/03 shall be interpreted. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 12:05 pm
Intent doesn't matter, malice doesn't matter (see WV's model jury instruction for felony murder here). [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 12:00 pm
According to the established case law developed in relation to A 96(2) EPC 1973 and also applicable, as far as the issues raised by the appellant are concerned, to A 94(3), the expression “as often as necessary” in this article indicates that the ED has a discretion which has to be exercised objectively in the light of the circumstances of the case (see for instance decisions T 162/82 [12], T 300/89 [9.1], and T 726/04 [7]). [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 4:00 am
” two-thirds answered “I don’t know/no opinion. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 5:00 am
As a matter of general survival the intelligence community needs to ensure relative good standing with the incoming Administration. [read post]
