Search for: "National Service Industries v. Powers"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 1,736
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2011, 1:46 pm
The key decision is Walz v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:35 pm
And even some who might have weighed the overall balance as positive saw it as their duty to enforce the national rules that cyber-enthusiasts were happily undermining. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:03 am
Bloomsbury International Limited and others v Sea Fish Industry Authority and Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, heard 23 – 24 March 2011. [read post]
6 May 2011, 3:46 pm
He had been born to wealth and sincerely believed it must be repaid with public service, not money-seeking power. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:13 am
National Foreign Trade Council, 530 U. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 7:36 am
SERVPRO Industries, Inc. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 1:04 pm
On February 23, 2011, in response to Federal court orders in Sierra Club v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:14 am
Justice Strathy then considered some “practical concerns” with the “loser pays” model in the class action context, as a result of which the costs of losing could be “astronomical” and “well beyond the reach of all but the powerful and very wealthy” who are “not exactly the group the legislature had in mind” when the relevant statutes were enacted. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 11:09 am
Hall Street Associates v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 1:18 am
Reform of Agriculture Section III: Promote Domestic Industry Section IV: Promote Service Industry Section V: Encourage Undeveloped Regions and Promote Urbanization Section VI: Green Development: Global Warming, Energy and Resource Conservation and Environmental Protection Section VII: Improve Domestic Innovation, Education and Workforce Training Section VIII: Improve the Livelihood of the People: Wages, Medical and Pension Section IX: Social Management and Control… [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
In his view the challenged decisions were all authorised as a consequence of the immigration rules albeit that in exercising the powers conferred by the rules UKBA was also purporting to act consistently with its published guidance. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 3:39 pm
Sony v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:05 am
The greatest threat to freedom of speech today is not simply that of public power or private power. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 12:37 pm
Shifting blame and slowing the permitting process poses a serious threat to domestic energy exploration, which fuels the manufacturing industry, the backbone of our nation's research, innovation and job creation. . . [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:48 am
There's also a neat Current Intelligence note by the perceptive Enrico Bonadio (City Law School, London) on the Advocate General's Opinion on what counts as "communication to the public" in the joined cases of Football Association Premier League v QC Leisure, YouTube and Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (Joined Cases C-403/08 and C-429/08), which the Court of Justice is going to decide this summer. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:00 am
Supreme Court in the affirmative action case of United Steelworkers of America v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 12:00 pm
The guidance identifies two examples that may qualify as innovative: the National Institutes of Health’s Small Business Innovative Research Program and National Institute of Standards and Technology’s Advanced Technology Program. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 11:58 am
., Hale v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 1:42 pm
Syndicate (Click here for details) Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 10:40 am
Sorrel v. [read post]
