Search for: "Newman, Appeal of" Results 1401 - 1420 of 1,629
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2021, 10:11 am by Dennis Crouch
Judge NEWMAN wrote a concurring opinion and would have found no implied contract. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
 This is an appeal by the BBC from the decision of the Inner House [2013] CSIH 43. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 9:29 am by Dennis Crouch
The parties relied upon Supreme Court for support and the case has some chance of heading up. = = = = = [1] Federal Circuit Appeal No. 14-1771, appeal of PTAB IPR 2013-00209. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 11:33 am
A first appeal "held the asserted claims invalid for lack of written description. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 6:00 am by Bruce E. Boyden
Judge Newman is clear on this in the Ringgold opinion when he locates the de minimis line and the substantial similarity (proper) line at exactly the same place. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 5:07 am by Dennis Crouch
Judge Newman was more appreciative of the difference between a hairbrush and a toothbrush but she was in the minority. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:02 am by Dennis Crouch
Boston lawyer Michael Newman (Mintz) argued for the patentee Copan and was joined in the brief by Peter Cuomo, Andrew DeVoogd, Courtney Patrice Herndon, and James Wodarski. [read post]
10 May 2010, 10:37 am by FDABlog HPM
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Circuit Judges Newman, Rader, and Linn) issued its unanimous decisions in two cases that should solidify as to when a patent covering a drug product is eligible for a Patent Term Extension (“PTE”). [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Murray v Raynor [2019] NSWCA 274 the Court of Appeal allowed an appeal against an award of $120,000 made by the District Court. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 7:53 am by John McFarland
Justice Lehrmann’s opinion cited an article by Jason Newman and Louis E. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 4:14 pm
[…] Judge Newman filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, arguing that all of petitioner’s claims are patent eligible. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 3:30 pm by Guest Blogger
Yet today’s exemptions seekers, as well as some of the justices, bristle at the comparison to the Supreme Court’s 1968 decision in Newman v. [read post]
5 May 2021, 9:07 am by CMS
  Lloyd contended that the Court of Appeal had previously deviated from Markt. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 3:58 am by CMS
Marex appealed the Court of Appeal’s decision to the Supreme Court, which was invited by the Court of Appeal to review the principle of reflective loss generally, including its conceptual basis. [read post]