Search for: "Orin Kerr"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 3,529
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2009, 11:58 pm
George Washington University Law School professor Orin Kerr, who is probably most renowned for his contributions to the Volokh Conspiracy, is publishing a paper in the upcoming Stanford Law Review titled “Applying the Fourth Amendment to the Internet: A General Approach”. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 11:35 am
(Orin Kerr) My co-blogger Randy asks for my explanation of part of a blog comment I left over at Prawfs on his use of “unprecedented. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 8:02 am
Alex Abdo of the Knight First Amendment Institute and Orin Kerr of George Washington Law debate whether warrantless searches and seizures of cellphone records violate the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 5:51 pm
(Orin Kerr) I wanted to follow up my recent post on Constitutional Theory Debates in a Nutshell by talking about what seems to be the core difficulty with grand constitutional theories — that is, single overarching methodologies to construe the Constitution. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 3:14 pm
(Orin Kerr) I appreciate Ilya’s post below on the meaning of “activity” in Commerce Clause jurisprudence, and I wanted to add two brief observations: 1) If I understand Ilya’s argument, he begins with an assumption as to how much power Congress has, and he then reasons backwards to infer the meaning of “activity” in order to make that assumption correct. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 10:20 am
(Orin Kerr) Over at Ricochet, via Instapundit, Paul Rahe argues that conservatives should prefer a government-run health care system paid for by higher taxes over an individual-mandate approach: Government exists first and foremost for the sake of our protection. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:48 am
(Orin Kerr) The Federalist Society had an interesting podcast on the issue back in October that you can listen to here. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 1:32 pm
(Orin Kerr) No, claims the plaintiff in Wong v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 9:21 am
(Orin Kerr) Today the Supreme Court granted cert in Ashcroft v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:40 am
(Orin Kerr) The difficulty some of the Justices had with pager technology in City of Ontario v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 4:30 am
This past Tuesday, Orin Kerr of The Volokh Conspiracy remarked upon the case of United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 1:17 pm
Amidst all the head-scratching, Orin Kerr here makes this nice point at The Volokh Conspiracy:This case really calls out for amicus participation to give the Justices context: In particular, it really needs briefs by leading historians on the history and evolution of how executions were carried out over time in the United States and at common law. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 1:03 pm
Having predicted that law will follow activity (and complaints) into the virtual worlds, let me now respond to Orin Kerr and look for obvious places where even some libertarians might favor intervention, criminal and otherwise. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 6:00 am
United States by Orin Kerr Third-Party Party-Crashing? [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 5:33 pm
(Orin Kerr) Today was a beautiful fall day in Washington, DC, and after the Jones argument I shot this 10-second video of what it’s like on the front steps of the Supreme Court after a 10 am oral argument. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 2:48 pm
(Orin Kerr) I’ve just received a copy of the new book by Justice Stevens, Five Chiefs: A Supreme Court Memoir. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 2:24 pm
(Orin Kerr) A Supreme Court Justice once published a law review article called Space Colonization and the Law that had the following in the first paragraph:[Y]ou may think that what I say is pure fantasy and that I’ve taken leave of my senses. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 11:14 pm
” My name is spelled with an “i,” not an “e,” and I sign my name here as “Orin Kerr. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 7:03 pm
(Orin Kerr) Someone should write a student note comparing the productivity and scholarly impact of entry-level law professors who have Ph.D.s with those who do not. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 12:47 pm
(Orin Kerr) One of the consequences of confirmation bias is that we are overly impressed by ideas that we happen to share. [read post]
