Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 4,554
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2019, 11:45 am
Assn. of United States, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 8:59 am
§115(d)(3)(E)(i)] The database shall include the title of the work, the copyright owner(s) and ownership percentage(s), contact information for the copyright owner (if known), and “to the extent reasonably available,” “the international standard musical work code” for the work, and “identifying information for sound recordings in which the musical work is embodied,” including titles, featured artists, sound recording copyright owners,… [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 11:38 am
San Diegans For Open Government v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 6:49 am
Call us at 714-937-2050. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 2:30 am
” Only 1 in 650 billion shirts would randomly match so precisely, Vorder Bruegge said, “give or take a few billion. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 8:35 pm
In that case, EEOC v. [read post]
19 Jan 2019, 8:13 am
It's a rather iPhone-centric perspective, but the biggest problem here for Qualcomm is that Judge Koh ruled in GPNE Corp. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 12:07 pm
On January 7, 2019, the New Jersey Appellate Division published a decision in Borough of Glassboro v. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 6:41 am
Instead, the Ordinance prescribes that data, with commendable precision. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 9:02 am
The varying standards of compliance with societal expectations may point corporate action in different direction. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
In New York v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 4:10 pm
The Riley Case (2014) (Riley v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 9:45 am
At most, only a fraction of the harassing Yik Yak posts would have qualified as “true threats,” which is a high legal standard precisely because it represents an incursion into the First Amendment. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 11:30 pm
In its statement of grounds of appeal, the appellant maintained the main request and auxiliary requests 1 to 5 considered in the contested decision and resubmitted those requests as main request and auxiliary requests I to V. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 2:40 pm
The full text of the decision in Frank v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
The taxpayer there had held shares of Standard Oil of California stock, and when the company declared a “stock dividend” (essentially, but not precisely, a stock split), the tax code required that she be taxed.In one sense, the majority’s decision in favor of Ms Macomber seems intuitively correct. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 3:06 pm
In the course of exchanges with a number of us who raised an eyebrow at this, she went on : https://twitter.com/louisetickle/status/1060817556217516032 I’m in no doubt that the family justice system means well, but that is utterly inadequate as a standard. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 2:11 pm
The state urged the Supreme Court to weigh in, arguing that the lower court had failed to use the kind of “limited and precise” test needed to ensure that courts weren’t interfering with conduct that is perfectly permissible. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 6:20 am
Weeks and Tenney v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 4:23 pm
Moroney v. [read post]
