Search for: "People v Levels (Robert)" Results 1401 - 1420 of 1,684
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2011, 1:00 am by litigationtech
He has provided trial presentation services in many high-profile and high-stakes matters, including the Dodgers McCourt divorce and People v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 6:13 pm by Larry Downes
  That discussion need only be brief largely because the extended legal analysis has already been admirably detailed by FCC Commissioner Robert McDowell. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 9:20 am
An injunction was applied for but again was rejected.At the Supreme Court level there has only been one case of Zacchini v Scripps- Howard Broadcasting Company, otherwise known as the Human Cannonball case where the defendants broadcast the entirety of a 15 second clip of a guy shooting himself out of a canon. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 8:22 pm
 But the fewer people who are bound by the ruling, the fewer people have standing to appeal. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 5:30 pm by Hani Sarji
We are talking about changing the estate tax to give a big break to people with $10 million or more in their estate. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 10:39 am by Steve Hall
John Edward Green, Jr., the defendant in Texas v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 4:08 am by Maxwell Kennerly
When the Roberts court returned to just an aspect of the issue in 2007 in Parents Involved v. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am by INFORRM
For example, in Ecclestone v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2009] EWHC 2779 (QB) (Sharp J), the alleged libel was a diary item in the Telegraph which quoted the claimant as saying that she was not a “veggie” and did not “have much time” for people like the McCartneys and Annie Lennox. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 11:40 am by Adam Thierer
You are asking us to create…  a whole new prohibition which the American people never — never ratified when they ratified the First Amendment. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 8:59 am by Lyle Denniston
Winn, et al. (09-987) and Garriott v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 3:26 pm by Aaron
Roberts’ claim, made for the first time on appeal, that the search of his vehicle was in violation of Arizona v. [read post]