Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 1,806
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2011, 11:00 pm
The Equality Regulations secured “goods and services” protections for lesbian and gay people, protecting them from discrimination. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 10:44 am
For instance, in Gosford Park I knew who the murderer was, but I had to see the film three times before I knew why various people were under suspicion, or who was married to whom. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 9:20 am
There are cases where Singapore do vary including the application of the law of passing off as applied in the House of Lords case of Scandecor. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm
Bank Mellat v HM Treasury [2011] EWCA Civ 1: read judgment. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:06 pm
But Dave is off being very clever to a tight deadline for other people, so I get to indulge my hobbyist's interest at your expense. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:06 pm
But Dave is off being very clever to a tight deadline for other people, so I get to indulge my hobbyist's interest at your expense. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:06 pm
But Dave is off being very clever to a tight deadline for other people, so I get to indulge my hobbyist's interest at your expense. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:35 am
Thus, prudent businesses and business people will undertake a separate risk assessment to determine what additional steps to take before the Bill becomes law. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 4:05 pm
Evidence was given at the trial that the VPR would have been circulated to not more than 150 people. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 1:55 pm
(David Allen Green in his Jack of Kent blog explains the reference to Pressdram v Arkell if you are not aware of the meaning.) [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 6:16 am
Lord Justice Sedley said that the ban on immigration for the purposes of marriage for people under 21 is an “arbitrary and disruptive impact of the rule on the lives of a large number of innocent young people”. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 10:23 am
Justice BhatThe Delhi High Court in Shri Rohit Shekhar vs Shri Narayan Dutt Tiwari & Anr., has examined the concept of DNA testing and the law pertaining to the same. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 12:30 am
In the 1765 case of Entick v Carrington the Lord Chief Justice declared that the law “should be clear in proportion as the power is exorbitant. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 8:43 pm
* Doe v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 4:31 am
Supreme Court ruling in Padilla v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 3:38 am
However, the court has done no more than confirm the basic principle that human rights are for all, not just for people we like. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 10:04 am
When I first read David Streitfeld’s article headline: “Homes at Risk, and No Help From Lawyers,” which ran on December 20th, in The New York Times I thought… Wow, well it’s about time… maybe someone’s finally gotten it. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 4:08 am
The Review Panel is due to publish its final set of proposals as an interim report, in the spring.Meanwhile, worrying news for divorce lawyers: we were informed that the divorce rate had fallen to its lowest in 29 years.FebruaryTo compliment that last item, February brought us the news that marriage rates were the lowest since they were first calculated in 1862.There was no shortage of care applications, however, with a rise of 43% in 2009, this largely being the cause of Cafcass being in… [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:05 pm
Lord Judge, the Lord Chief Justice has issued interim guidance that live text-based communication would be allowed as long as the judge believed it would not interfere with the administration of justice. [read post]
