Search for: "People v. Hill" Results 1401 - 1420 of 2,134
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2012, 12:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Kelly said, "It's one thing when people sell their blood for money; it's another when they sell their drugs, especially when the diversion compromises the pharmaceutical supply with tainted and outdated drugs. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 10:27 am by Steve Hall
Supreme Court's landmark ruling in Atkins v. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 8:47 am by Ziv Steinberg
A decade ago, the Supreme Court ruled that it is unconstitutional to execute people with mental retardation in Atkins v. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 8:47 am by Ziv Steinberg
A decade ago, the Supreme Court ruled that it is unconstitutional to execute people with mental retardation in Atkins v. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 2:52 am by SHG
While the Supreme Court held that a state could not put a retarded person to death in Atkins v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 9:30 am by Greg Ablavsky
Lowe, Princeton University A Slave’s Only Legal Right: Freedom Suits in the American StatesPeter Wallenstein, Virginia Polytechnic Institute The Indians’ Constitution: Uncovering the Native History of the FramingGregory Ablavsky, University of Pennsylvania COMMENT:   Alfred Brophy, University of North Carolina,Chapel Hill (As you can see, I'm hoping a few of you can tough it out until Sunday morning, so there are at least as many… [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 8:10 am by Walter Olson
Dukes [The Hill, Paul Karlsgodt, PoL, Andrew Trask] Lefties: you ‘tarians slight the greater freedom of being able to force people to employ you [MR: Tyler Cowen, Alex Tabarrok] If you’re caught sleeping on the job, courts may not prove sympathetic to your age bias claim [Eric Meyer, Employer Handbook] Tweet Tags: age discrimination, EEOC, Indiana, labor unions, Wal-Mart v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 9:35 am by Alfred Brophy
By focusing on arguments about the backlash against Roe v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:21 am by Yvonne Daly
A v Governor of Arbour Hill Prison [2006] 4 I.R. 88; [2006] IESC 45. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 9:26 am by Marc DeGirolami
.  Some people claim that one kind of difference relates to the additional sorts of negative consequences that committing a criminal act brings about which violating a non-criminal law does not.  Sometimes this is described in terms of stigma or some sort of consequence -- including a legal consequence -- additional to the bare fact of illegality.  Just afterward, the Chief says this: "[I]t is estimated that four million people each year will choose to… [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 2:47 pm by joel
Monday, March 26th 2012 by Tyler Hill   Abstract             The advent of social media in the workplace has triggered a host of newfound legal ambiguities that most recently have been illuminated in Phonedog v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 1:47 pm by Elie Mystal
[ABC News] * The Marbury v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 1:47 pm by Elie Mystal
[ABC News] * The Marbury v. [read post]