Search for: "People v. Jones"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 2,152
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2018, 12:46 pm
Bland v. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 5:42 am
While it is atypical for courts to find state action in a reactionary (as opposed to a "sting") shoplifting case, the Court of a Appeals, New York's highest court, found in People v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 9:30 am
Schwarzenegger (now Hollingsworth v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 4:04 am
Supreme Court 9-0 ruling in United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 7:13 am
The Associated Press reports here on the aftermath of Ramirez v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 4:27 am
After all, who would believe that when ChatGPT tells you that Smith v. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 10:17 am
There is no case of Smith v. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 11:16 pm
Corp v. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 2:47 pm
Jones, Under the Umbrella: Assessing Recent Court Decisions that Promote Public Access to the Law The key principle: law must be available, and people need access to it. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 10:15 am
Jones, 520 U. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:54 pm
Jones involves a question that is common in the class-action context: What happens when it’s not practical for the defendant to pay every member of the class? [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 1:05 pm
Jones, 158 N.C. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 1:50 pm
I haven’t looked comprehensively at state cases, but some of the cases that I stumbled on, or that are frequently discussed in the other cases in this area, are summarized below: People v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 1:05 pm
Jones, 158 N.C. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 1:05 pm
Our clients are “people” and not “cases” or “files. [read post]
3 Dec 2006, 7:53 pm
v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 10:04 am
Americans United Inc. (1974), and Bob Jones Univ. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am
Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 301 U.S. 1 (1937) (federal regulatory power extended to intra state activities that could cumulatively have a substantial effect on commerce); Heart of Atlanta Motel v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
(IP Dragon) Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People's Court:Konica’s claim dismissed: Konica Minolta Holdings Inc v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
(IP Dragon) Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People's Court:Konica’s claim dismissed: Konica Minolta Holdings Inc v. [read post]
