Search for: "People v. Kennedy"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 2,858
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2020, 2:35 am
For instance, in C-484/14 McFadden, the CJEU sought a remedy that would least infringe the defendant's rights, and in 26839/05 Kennedy v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 4:07 am
See James v. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
But some people are more difficult to find than others. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:52 am
Additional information on the case is available on the Lewis v. [read post]
2 Apr 2016, 12:20 pm
The touchstone became economic evidence (see Lucent v Gateway, ResQnet v Lansa, Uniloc v Microsoft). [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
But an even bigger development (that I shall elaborate in the space below) turns out to be an action not by an elected state legislature, but instead by the Supreme Court in last month’s ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
And when the people speak, the Court listens. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:35 am
Last year, in State v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 3:08 pm
”What was the basis for Justice Kennedy’s concern? [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 6:21 am
Roy and Lyng v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:30 pm
In Perez v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 7:29 am
” The Washington Post reports that in the wake of District of Columbia v. [read post]
8 Oct 2024, 8:55 pm
Often, when pressed, such advocates appeal to Justice Kennedy’s statement, made in dicta, in Obergefell v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 5:53 am
Right now that is Justice Kennedy. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 4:47 am
” Additional coverage of the solicitor general’s amicus brief in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:11 am
Following up on Breyer’s point a few minutes later, Kennedy wondered whether it “[i]s the domain of copyright to [protect] the way people present themselves to the world. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 7:55 am
The oral argument in Sturgeon v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 12:49 pm
As our case amply demonstrates, campaign finance legislation over the last two decades has imposed, as Justice Kennedy put it, a 'censorship . . . vast in its reach.' By overruling Austin v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 5:58 pm
Mohamed et al v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 5:09 am
In addition to the key case of Rottmann v Freistaat Bayern [2010] ECR I-1449 numerous other authorities such as Kaur [2001] All ER (EC) 250, McCarthy [2011] All ER (EC) 729 Zambrano [2011] ECR I-1177 and Dereci [2011] ECR I-11315 were analysed and applied to his case. [read post]
