Search for: "People v. Novel" Results 1401 - 1420 of 1,823
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2019, 12:22 pm by Evan Lee
Supreme Court will puzzle over this classic, yet novel, statutory question of “mens rea,” or criminal intent, when it hears argument on April 23 in Rehaif v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 8:55 pm by Rory Little
Alito’s opinion hewed closely to the excessive force precedent of Graham v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 6:26 am
Cohen then progressed through the test for design right protection: is a camel coat novel? [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For example, in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
15 May 2025, 1:21 pm
” The amendment was added to the Constitution specifically to overrule the Supreme Court’s notorious 1857 decision in Dred Scott v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 11:54 am by Rebecca Tushnet
To what extent is this value created by the public v. the person. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 10:40 am by Eric Goldman
Viewing competitive keyword advertising as procompetitive isn’t novel, but it’s satisfying to to see the FTC embrace the view so enthusiastically. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
In Murray, the issue of children’s reasonable expectation of privacy was a novel one. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
And time and again, those courts determined that the transactions at issue—ranging from investment opportunities in oil barrels to fishing boats to silver foxes—did in fact constitute the offer or sale of securities.[8] And then in 1946, the Supreme Court issued its seminal opinion in SEC v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm by Guest Author
   Take another example: the Clean Power Plan overturned by the Supreme Court in West Virginia v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 3:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
The architecture is rich and varied, the people are warm and friendly. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Supreme Court was scheduled to hear argument later this month in Gloucester County School Board v. [read post]
29 Dec 2024, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
  In Sir James Dyson v MGN Limited [2023] EWHC 3092 (KB), Jay J declined to draw an such an inference of serious harm where the contested publication was in a national newspaper. [read post]