Search for: "Peoples v. Peoples"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 72,895
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2008, 6:01 pm
It's as good a reason as any -- or at least good enough -- to publish an opinion merely to put to rest meritless arguments that nonetheless seem to be repeatedly raised in the Court of AppealOr, as Justice Scotland puts it so artfully here: "Our point in publishing this opinion is to say in no uncertain terms that a moribund claim like that raised by defendant has breathed its last breath. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 11:07 am
I'll just tell the story on this one:"Defendant was 18 years old when she gave birth to her son, later named Cameron, in April 2007. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 2:03 pm
Nope, nope, nope.I agree with the Court of Appeal that there was probable cause to arrest Reid Nottoli for driving under the influence. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 12:37 pm
The unanimous opinion in this one is correct. [read post]
2 May 2024, 1:03 pm
Justice Corrigan authors a powerful opinion that holds that it's not permissible for the police to conduct a Terry stop just because someone's in a high crime area and pretending to tie his shoe behind a car in order to avoid the police, and Justice Evan authors an equally powerful concurrence (joined by a majority of the Court) that highlights the racial implications of a rule that assumes that the "normal" response to a police encounter is to welcome and/or consent to… [read post]
7 May 2021, 2:34 pm
Doesn't it seem like Justice Grover is clearly and unambiguously right here? [read post]
28 May 2008, 11:30 am
Just because you got away with shooting your first wife in the head while she slept doesn't mean that you're going to get away with shooting your third wife in the head while she sleeps. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 8:49 pm
Tahisha Clay, a six-year old girl, and her nine-year old brother Stefan were tossing a ball back and forth to each other in the apartment complex in which they lived when the ball rolled down a hill. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 11:39 am
The majority (led by Justice Corrigan) and dissent (authored by Justice Kennard) disagree on whether there's constitutional or prejudicial error. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 12:18 pm
The California Supreme Court finally wades into the Riverside County mess. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 12:13 pm
How often do you see a prosecution for lynching in the twenty-first century? [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 3:26 pm
Justice Yegan begins this opinion by saying:"An attempt to commit armed robbery is extremely dangerous. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 3:00 pm
This is an otherwise unexceptional affirmance. [read post]
16 May 2017, 4:25 pm
When I think of a carjacking, I think of someone putting a gun to someone's head, or throwing them out of the car, or doing stuff like that and then taking their vehicle. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:57 pm
Sorry, my gun-loving friends. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 2:48 pm
For a good portion of this opinion, based upon its tone and content, I thought that Justice Cornell was going to hold that the gang enhancement here was proper. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 10:48 am
Good ol' pretextual stops.Such fun. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 2:07 pm
Here's a guy I'm glad will be off the streets. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 2:16 pm
I haven't conducted any empirical research on the point. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 2:23 pm
When they talk about getting off on a technicality, this is what they mean.Though here, it's not the constable who's blundered. [read post]
