Search for: "Peoples v. State"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 45,532
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2017, 2:21 pm
Restraining orders are legal orders that protect a person or multiple people from another person. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 9:26 pm
State, 25 So. 3d 600 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010), and Mackey v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:28 am
In United States Civil Service Commission v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:24 pm
Today’s opinion in McDonald v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 4:34 am
Motorcycling was just one of the many things original plaintiff in State Farm v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 4:05 am
The brief complaint (full text) in People of the United States of America and the State of California v. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 6:54 pm
In People of the State of Illinois v. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 4:19 pm
In Burkhart v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 6:17 am
When the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 8:09 am
However, in defending its controversial abortion law, the State of Mississippi has asked the Court to overturn its prior decisions in Roe v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:07 pm
People in court with family disputes make up the largest single category of users of free legal asisstance, not only in the United States but in all peer nations (most with legal aid programs significantly more generous than ours). [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 9:15 am
The United States Supreme Court weighed the Right of Publicity against first amendment rights in the case of Zacchini v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 6:28 am
ACLU, Feb. 29, 2024 "The United States District Court for the Western District of Texas today granted a motion for preliminary injunction to block Texas Senate Bill 4 (88-4), which would permit local and state law enforcement to arrest, detain, and remove people they suspect to have entered Texas from another country without federal authorization. [read post]
10 May 2011, 12:55 pm
"Which reminded Justice Aaronson of a hypothetical that Justice Mosk authored in the NYU Law Review:"Judge: I sentence you to 200 years in state prison. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 2:03 pm
First, notice that the State actually prevailed below. [read post]
31 May 2007, 1:15 pm
For comparison's sake, the United States Supreme Court held in Simmons that a defendant's incriminating statements in support of a motion to suppress on Fourth Amendment grounds (e.g., an admission that he owned the suitcase in which the drugs were found) weren't admissible at trial, holding that it's "intolerable that one constitutional right should have to be surrendered in order to assert another. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 12:39 pm
We apparently don't use that term as much here in California as elsewhere, even though many many other states use it, and it also appears in CJS as well as in a wide variety of other treatises.)Regardless, the term's now been used in a California case, right? [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 11:27 am
I cannot subscribe to such an expansive interpretation of the natural and probable consequences doctrine even in the context of gang violence, which no one doubts is a plague upon some of our state's most vulnerable communities. [read post]
19 May 2009, 9:29 am
If not multiple appeals, depending on what transpires below.None of this even mentions the state habeas petitions, the federal habeas petition(s), and all the other stuff that you totally know will come in the future with any reimposed death sentence.I'm telling you this right now: Michael Burgener will die in prison, but it won't be from an antiseptic needle in the arm. [read post]
21 May 2007, 1:57 pm
Yeah, that's a pain, but it happens incredibly rarely, and it's better to retry than to deprive someone of an appeal because the state/court reporter screwed up.A very short opinion; only five doubled-spaced pages. [read post]
