Search for: "Power v. Holder" Results 1401 - 1420 of 2,842
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2015, 9:31 am by Amul Kalia
Related Issues: Fair Use and Intellectual Property: Defending the BalanceDMCAFree SpeechRelated Cases: Viacom v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 4:46 pm by Ronald Collins
Some important take-away points from the majority opinion Satisfying a compelling state interest: When it comes to denying a First Amendment expression claim owing to a finding of a compelling state interest, that, too, is quite rare — Holder v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 8:21 am by Tara Hofbauer
-led forces drove them from power in 2001. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
Apotex case Monday, case summary and webcast to listen http://t.co/f1KeAesP3r -> NZ global mode ISPs to be sued for copyright infringement http://t.co/zcaAS2IQMu -> Pirate Bay Co-Founder Unable To Experience The Joys Of NES Behind Bars http://t.co/SBGsRgVgFl -> Record Labels Accuse YouTube Of Causing Them To Lose Money http://t.co/mqHp07gxzz -> HBO Criticizes Periscope Over 'Game of Thrones' Live Streams, Issues Take-Down Notices http://t.co/CMoO1BtgMi -> Proposed new… [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 10:26 am
Paul Levy, over at Public Citizen, has an interesting discussion of a recent decision by the Virginia Supreme Court in a case (Yelp v Hadeed Carpet Cleaning) involving the right to speak anonymously. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 8:51 am
  (2) It’s consistent with the statute, and thus within FDA’s power to adopt, without years of legal haggling. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:49 am by Jim Singer
In Continental Automotive GmbH et al v. iBiquity Digital Corporation, the plaintiff held a license from the patent holder. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 10:25 pm by Aaron Feigelson
It’s not an understatement to say that the NTP v. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 11:05 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 We found very powerful trends in the responses. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 6:03 am
A court that has personal jurisdiction has both the authority to rule on the law and facts of a suit and the power to enforce its decision upon a party to the suit. . . . [read post]