Search for: "REED v. REED"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 3,266
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2009, 1:45 pm
Buono (08-472) — right to sue to challenge religious movement on public lands Reed Elvesier v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm
This is an important development, not least because the McInerney Homeshurdle is a high one (see, eg, SZ (Pakistan) v Minister for Justice [2013] IEHC 95 (01 March 2013); Nee v An Bord Pleanala [2013] IEHC 584 (29 October 2013); Kilarden Investments Ltd v Kirwans (Galway) Ltd [2013] IEHC 602 (01 November 2013); Rughoonauth v Minister for Justice [2017] IEHC 241 (24 April 2017); English… [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 1:01 am
” In Dalehite et al. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 11:32 am
Geman v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 6:28 am
Lucie Lodge 1189 Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 9:49 am
Donovan v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:48 am
On 6 July 2011, the UKSC delivered its judgment in Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc No 2 v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 32. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 9:16 am
* Shrader v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:33 pm
Co. v. [read post]
12 May 2012, 10:48 am
Malibu Media, LLC v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 3:25 am
In Regeneron v Kymab (IPKat post here), a patent was found enabled and thus sufficiently disclosed despite the example methods provided in the specification being unworkable at the time of the invention. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 4:32 am
In Reed v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 7:33 am
Reed, 19 Misc 3d 217, 219, 851 NYS2d 331 (Crim Ct, Kings Cty, 2008)." [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 5:29 pm
Reed), and when an airline conducts a search under a program designed by the FAA (United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2019, 6:30 am
Since the Supreme Court’s decision in Reed v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm
Stout, Why We Should Stop Teaching Dodge v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 3:42 am
Lord Reed gave a dissenting judgment. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 6:00 am
The appeal was heard by Lords Neuberger, Kerr, Reed, Hughes and Dyson; a video recording of the hearing is available here. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 7:38 am
(See generally 1-800 Contacts, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 2:49 pm
[IPKat comment - more explicit acknowledgment than in Arsenal v Reed ECJ that a trade mark has functions other than the origin function] [read post]
