Search for: "Read v. People" Results 1401 - 1420 of 21,617
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2020, 9:28 am by Eric Goldman
Then again, it seems that such an expansive reading virtually ensures the statute’s unconstitutionality, at least with respect to applying to pure speech like review sites. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
  It can sensibly be inferred that a post on a Facebook group with 16,000 members was read by a substantial number of people. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:48 am by Hope Lewis - Guest
The following is an essay for our symposium on Arizona v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 7:15 pm by Brian Shiffrin
As detailed in a post last Fall (see) in People v Colville (79 AD3d 189 [2nd Dept 2010]) the Second Department, without reaching a decision on the issue, engaged in detailed review of the arguments as to whether the decision to submit a lesser included offense is a fundamental one that must be made by the defendant or is a strategic one that can be made by counsel. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 7:15 pm by Brian Shiffrin
As detailed in a post last Fall (see) in People v Colville (79 AD3d 189 [2nd Dept 2010]) the Second Department, without reaching a decision on the issue, engaged in detailed review of the arguments as to whether the decision to submit a lesser included offense is a fundamental one that must be made by the defendant or is a strategic one that can be made by counsel. [read post]