Search for: "Roberts v. State" Results 1401 - 1420 of 16,926
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
And the Strasbourg Court has stated unambiguously that it regards the strictest institution permitted by UK law, the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC), to be a  ”fully independent court” which is best placed to ensure that no material was unnecessarily withheld from the detainee (A v United Kingdom 49 EHRR 695). [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 8:24 am by Court C. VanTassell
This week, in a split 7-2 opinion authored by Chief Justice Roberts, the Supreme Court held that Montana state law claims brought by private landowners against Atlantic Richfield Company (“ARCO”) for alleged impacts from the Anaconda Smelter Superfund site are not preempted by CERCLA and are not precluded by ARCO’s settlement of EPA’s CERCLA claims; however, any restoration damages awarded to the landowners must be spent on actual restoration of the… [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 2:29 pm by Clark West
One saw something of this line of reasoning in the following comment on a Catholic blog: “It was intended to state an opinion that hurt people. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 12:24 pm by Robert Wagner
As can be seen from the Federal Circuit’s recent decision in Magsil Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 7:57 am by Adam J. White
As Dahlia noted a couple of weeks ago, Chief Justice Roberts used his dissent in Sprint v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 7:57 am by Adam White
As Dahlia noted  a couple of weeks ago , Chief Justice Roberts used his dissent in Sprint v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 4:06 pm by Jon Sands
  (Roger and Robert Murray are brothers, and these opinions relate to the same crime.)After conducting an independent review of the news media reports about the case, see Daniels v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 8:07 am by Ken White
Listen to it at Legal Talk Network or stream right here: Some resources from this episode: United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:09 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Sir Robert Lloyd & Co Ltd. [read post]