Search for: "STAND et al. v. STATE."
Results 1401 - 1420
of 2,184
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2012, 10:26 am
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and Town of Riverhead, et al. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 2:04 pm
See Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound et al., v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 10:35 am
District Court's Order Denying Temporary Restraining Order in Emmanuel Temple, et al. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 3:14 pm
The Order of Judge Richard Smoak in a recent Federal District Court case (Opis Management, LLC, et. al. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:19 pm
OSCAR VARGAS, ET AL. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 9:31 am
Town of East Haven, et. al.). [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm
In National Association of Homebuilders, et al. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 10:13 am
Hovenkamp, et al., IP and Antitrust: An Analysis of Antitrust Principles Applied to Intellectual Property Law 11-59 (2d ed. 2010). [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 9:03 am
Obama, et al., 2011 WL 6415354 (9th Cir. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 10:03 am
Greenleaf Arms et al., 2011 WL 1130638. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 1:38 pm
Supreme Court on behalf of the plaintiffs (the Association for Molecular Pathology, et al.) for review of 1) whether human genes should be patented, and 2) whether persons who lack evidence of personal and direct threat of an infringement action lack standing to challenge a patent. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:17 pm
Recently I wrote about the coercion question posed by Florida et al. in the PPACA litigation. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 5:15 pm
Al. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 5:15 pm
Al. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 8:00 am
Amicus brief of Arkansas et al.Amicus brief of Alabama Forestry Association et al.Amicus brief of National Alliance of Forest Owners et al.Amicus brief of American Forest Resource Council et al. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 7:00 am
Rule 205 requires an ATP to request advance authorization by completing a form, WC-205, provided by the State Board of Workers' Compensation (Board). [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 12:56 am
Under 720 ILCS 5/14-1, et. al. an eavesdropping device is defined as "any device capable of being used to hear or record oral conversation or intercept, retain, or transcribe electronic communications whether such conversation or electronic communication is conducted in person, by telephone, or by any other means. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 10:26 am
Fourth, though Florida et al. essentially argue they are locked-in to participating in Medicaid, and it is true that most states could not afford to run their own welfare medicine programs, it is not a direct line to concluding that states are coerced into participating in Medicaid. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 12:01 am
Honolulutraffic.com,et al. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 7:14 am
The case is Reichle, et al., v. [read post]
