Search for: "STATE v BURNS" Results 1401 - 1420 of 3,332
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2021, 4:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Accordingly, the Appellate Division concluded that Supreme Court should have granted those branches of the petition which sought to compel disclosure of the documents sought in Plaintiff's FOIL requests that were the subject of this appeal. * New York State Public Officers Law Article 6. ** See Matter of Data Tree, LLC v Romaine, 9 NY3d 454.*** The basic concept underlying FOIL is that all government documents and records, other than those having access specifically limited… [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 7:04 am by Vishnu Kannan
District Court for the District of Columbia’s ruling in United States of America v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 6:05 am
Activists were able to secure therapeutic laws in some thirteen states,not simply in the South (indeed I'm not sure which Southern states Gene Burns is thinking of, since a quick look at David Garrow's book reveals that Alabama failed to pass any legislation, Texas law, of course, remained draconian [Roe v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 6:05 am
Activists were able to secure therapeutic laws in some thirteen states,not simply in the South (indeed I'm not sure which Southern states Gene Burns is thinking of, since a quick look at David Garrow's book reveals that Alabama failed to pass any legislation, Texas law, of course, remained draconian [Roe v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 3:34 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The appeal turned primarily on Section 9.7 (b) of the operating agreement, which stated: Upon the death or disability of a Member (in the case of a Member who is an individual) . . . [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Burns, Judicial Corporal Punishment in the United States? [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 3:23 am by Jon Hyman
http://t.co/HgtvN2ksk3 — Chai Feldblum (@chaifeldblum) March 25, 2014 If you need any greater reminder of the need for the Employment Nondiscrimination Act (ENDA), which would amend Title VII to include sexual orientation and gender identity, look no further than Burns v. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 9:35 am by Gallivan & Gallivan
Under New York Labor Labor Law, Part 23, Protection in Construction, Demolition, and Excavation Operations, New York State requires that appropriate eye protection be provided to individuals and must be used by all persons while employed in welding, burning or cutting operations or in chipping, cutting or grinding any material from which particles may fly, or while engaged in any other operation which may endanger the eyes. 12 NYCRR 23-1.8(a). [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 1:00 pm
  The Book of Genesis -- sort of the  Marbury v. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Lyle Denniston
In a 1966 decision, in a Hawaii state legislative redistricting case, Burns v. [read post]