Search for: "STATE v HOLMES" Results 1401 - 1420 of 1,545
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2008, 3:21 pm
Beatty, No. 07-0784 (DocketDB), consolidated for oral argument with Holmes v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 11:51 am by MTTLR Blog Editor
Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes said it best in his dissent in Northern Securities Co. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 11:54 pm
Additionally, respected public health organizations worldwide have reviewed the data, and every major group has stated that food irradiation is a potential tool to protect the public health. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 9:31 pm
TITLE: Three Generations, No Imbeciles SUBTITLE: Eugenics, the Supreme Court, and Buck v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
Oliveira Ardor New York Senior Broker Associate 2 Gina Berger Lower East End Realty Brokerage - Commercial / Investment Sales 2 Ariel Toledano ant propeties inc Brokerage - Residential 3 Michael Xylas Xylas & Ziccardi, LLP Real Estate Attorney 3 Tracy Mehlman Marcus and Millichap Brokerage - Residential 3 David Hale 50 State Building Advisors Executive Vice President 3 Venecia DeSilva upscalecorp@yahoo.com investor 2 John Choi … [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:53 pm
I joined a group of law professors and public-interest groups that filed an amicus brief Friday in the case of United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:00 am
Holmes, Religious Affiliation, Personal Beliefs, and the President's Framing of Judicial Nominees, 56 Drake Law Review 679-704 (2008).Christine L. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 7:09 pm
The blawgosphere has been buzzing about the supposed death of punitive damages in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]