Search for: "Scalia v. United States"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 4,636
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2010, 6:30 pm
United States. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 6:03 pm
The Legal Information Institute (LII) at Cornell Law School has posted an article outlining the major decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States for the 2011-2012 term.From the introduction:"The 2011-2012 Supreme Court Term marks the first time in three years that there was not a new justice on the bench. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 9:31 am
United States, 393 F.3d 1277, 1281 (Fed. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 2:09 pm
Doing so, Justice Scalia, warned in Rasul v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 5:07 am
” Briefly: At The Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Center blog, Lisa Soronen summarizes the State and Local Legal Center’s amicus brief in Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 12:16 pm
The BIG FUSS this week has been about United States v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 8:00 am
United States, 561 U.S. 358 (2010). [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 8:47 am
Assistant Solicitor General Eric Miller appeared next on behalf of the United States as an amicus curiae supporting the respondent. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 4:05 pm
United States, see here. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 11:46 am
In its time, it did a great deal of good.It is that history that Justice Scalia implicitly relied on in his dissent in Lee v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 1:01 am
” On June 26, 2013, The Supreme Court, in United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 4:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 2:02 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
RLUIPA is the statute enacted to apply to state prisons and land use following Boerne v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
RLUIPA is the statute enacted to apply to state prisons and land use following Boerne v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 12:13 pm
FREDERICK: In the United States. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:04 am
United States, No. 13-983. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:13 am
But Justice Scalia, writing for the Court, went ahead with the rest of the opinion. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 1:56 pm
” As we said in United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 2:33 pm
United States, the Court wrestled with the question of whether convictions for offenses involving coca paste should be subject to the same mandatory minimum sentence as those involving crack. [read post]
