Search for: "Scalia v. United States"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 4,636
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2016, 12:04 pm
Army Corps v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 7:28 am
United States will be declared to apply retroactively for all purposes, including on first and even successive (assuming they are timely filed) habeas corpus petitions. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 5:11 am
United States, holding that the pretrial freeze of a criminal defendant’s untainted assets violates the Sixth Amendment right to retain counsel of choice. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 4:40 am
United States, 491 U. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 11:34 am
United States and United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 10:09 am
United States, No. 14-419. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 11:53 am
A group of public school teachers sought to overturn a 1977 United States Supreme Court decision in Abood v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 7:51 am
As I stated on Twitter:Just in: Abood lives, because Justice Scalia died. [read post]
26 Mar 2016, 2:10 pm
The recent decision from the United States Supreme Court in Caetano v. [read post]
26 Mar 2016, 11:16 am
This precise issue was addressed by the Supreme Court in Marbury v. [read post]
26 Mar 2016, 7:30 am
” United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 10:54 am
Justice James Iredell died at the age of forty-eight from the toll of riding the Southern Circuit four times in five years, including trips to New York City, which was then the capital of the United States. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 10:53 am
The question presented in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 8:01 am
In Sturgeon v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 7:45 am
Last June, Justice Scalia wrote the opinion in Johnson v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 5:11 am
United States. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
European Community, in which the Court is considering whether and to what extent RICO applies outside the United States. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am
First up is Wittman v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 10:45 am
From State v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:41 pm
Kennedy Institute for the United States Senate, only thirty-nine percent of those surveyed could explain that the Senate is assigned the role of advising and consenting to new Supreme Court nominees. [read post]
