Search for: "Series of Essays"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 3,221
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2017, 4:00 am
. ___ (2017), at Duke today as part of its Tax Policy Workshop Series hosted by Lawrence Zelenak: This essay considers the distributional consequences of the Supreme Court’s federalism jurisprudence over the past quarter century, focusing specifically... [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 10:00 am
ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Benjamin Wittes wrote an essay in memory of former Atlantic editor and Washington Post columnist Michael Kelly. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 4:45 am
In the Foreign Policy Essay, Jacob Stokes and Alexander Sullivan argued that China will not fix North Korea, offering four other areas of focus instead. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 7:03 am
Part Three in a Four Part Series. [read post]
25 Mar 2017, 4:55 am
In the Foreign Policy Essay, Raphael S. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 11:25 am
North Korea has recently conducted five nuclear tests and a series of missile launches in defiance of U.N. sanctions, and is believed to be working on a warhead that could reach the United States. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 8:24 am
These books inspired a series of well known review essays, most notably culminating in Clifford Geertz’s piece “Culture War. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
In 1933, Polish lawyer Raphael Lemkin made a presentation to the Legal Council of the League of Nations conference on international criminal law, for which he prepared an essay on the Crime of Barbarity, positioned as a crime against international law. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 1:00 pm
This essay considers the distributional consequences of the Supreme Court’s federalism jurisprudence over the past quarter century, focusing specifically... [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 7:59 am
Part Two in a Four part Series. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 1:00 pm
Daniel Hemel (Chicago) presents The Federalist Safeguards of Progressive Taxation at NYU today as part of its Tax Policy Colloquium Series hosted by Daniel Shaviro and Rosanne Altshuler: This essay considers the distributional consequences of the Supreme Court’s federalism jurisprudence over the past quarter century, focusing specifically on the anticommandeering,... [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 12:20 pm
Stanford Law School has also produced a helpful collection of essays on 12 subjects. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 12:48 pm
This is the first of a series of posts that will develop reflections both on the teaching of embedded programs in Cuba, generally, but more specifically as a way of documenting the way my students and see see Cuba today. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 4:28 pm
For an in-depth discussion on the first order, please see my two-part series on Lawfare ((Part I and Part II) ) and my forthcoming essay in the Texas Law Review See Also, titled The 9th Circuit’s Contrived Comedy of Errors in Washington v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 10:16 am
The review, which is being considered at senior levels of the National Security Council, would undo a series of rules known as the “Presidential Policy Guidance” imposed to rein in drone operations outside active war zones. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
” In May 2016 Clarke published a short essay on Facebook titled, “When Journalism Becomes an Obsession. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 8:06 am
The Stanford Law Review has a series of student essays analyzing Supreme Court nominee Judge Neil Gorsuch's decisions on the U.S. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 3:48 am
” The Stanford Law Review offers a series of essays by Stanford law students that analyze Gorsuch’s jurisprudence in various areas of the law. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:56 pm
For an in-depth discussion on the first order, please see my two-part series on Lawfare (Part I and Part II) and my forthcoming essay in the Texas Law Review See Also, titled The 9th Circuit’s Contrived Comedy of Errors in Washington v. [read post]
11 Mar 2017, 6:47 pm
For an in-depth discussion on the first order, please see my two-part series on Lawfare (Part I and Part II) and my forthcoming essay in the Texas Law Review See Also, titled The 9th Circuit’s Contrived Comedy of Errors in Washington v. [read post]
