Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 4,115
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2018, 5:08 pm
The world of directors’ and officers’ liability is always dynamic, but 2017 was a particularly eventful year in the D&O liability arena. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 5:28 pm
Sharpe v. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 2:45 am
” Similarly, in Kohler Co. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 9:30 am
This book visits Brown v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 7:09 am
This work will encompass multiple research projects with the current proposals looking at: the role of price differentials, sector specific impacts and enforcement impacts.BREAKING: CJEU holds that SPCs cannot be obtained on the basis of an "end of procedure notice" pursuant to Article 3(b) SPC RegulationMr Justice Arnold referred two questions to the CJEU on the SPC Regulation in Merck Sharp & Dohme v Comptroller-General of Patents [2016] EWHC… [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 4:00 am
Blackman cites the 1926 case of Myers v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 12:00 pm
There were many, including Harris v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 6:00 am
In the United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 12:26 pm
Brady material gets its name from the landmark 1963 United States Supreme Court decision of Brady v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 11:34 am
The AmeriKat's new tattoo Back in July last year right, at the end of the Court's Trinity Term, Mr Justice Arnold referred two questions to the CJEU on the SPC Regulation in Merck Sharp & Dohme v Comptroller-General of Patents [2016] EWHC 1896. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 11:00 am
Rumsfeld (2004) (allowing detention of a U.S. citizen as an enemy combatant) and in Boumediene v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 8:48 am
Amid a sharp dispute about its power to rule on a new case on same-sex marriage, the Supreme Court refused on Monday to clarify when those couples have a right to government-provided benefits. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 9:02 pm
ACLU Foundation v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 11:50 am
The United States described the evolution of its position on Jerusalem from this point forward in its 2014 merits brief in the matter of Zivotofsky v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
Moving to the 1980s: it took empowering the courts with the Charter before bar entrance requirements banning non-citizens and bans on inter-provincial law firms were removed (Andrews v Law Society of British Columbia [1989] 1 SCR 143 and Black v Law Society of Alberta [1989] 1 SCR 591, respectively). [read post]
24 Nov 2017, 8:37 am
It was, however, adverted to in the Court of Appeal, where Sharp LJ said: I can quite see why there was no issue below that it was the unexpressed intention of the parties that Mr. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 11:24 am
Bolling v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 4:08 am
In Peterson v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 2:13 am
The Lotton Case In a Minnesota case called Lotton v Savich Herefords, LLC in which Professor Kleinberger testified at trial as an expert witness, the plaintiffs, who received by assignment from their deceased father’s estate his economic rights in the LLC, sued the remaining active member for breach of fiduciary duty, alleging various acts of waste and mismanagement of LLC assets. [read post]
