Search for: "Stark v. Stark" Results 1401 - 1420 of 2,490
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm by NL
Mr Stark also considered that there might be circumstances in which a third party could be cross-examined by the applicant or the applicant's representative. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm by NL
Mr Stark also considered that there might be circumstances in which a third party could be cross-examined by the applicant or the applicant's representative. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:20 pm by Adam Wagner
Prisoners (as in Keenan v United Kingdom (2001) 33 EHRR 913),conscripts (Álvarez Ramón v Spain (application no 51192/99) 3 July 2001) and mental patients (Herczegfalvy v Austria (1992) 15 EHRR 437) are in a different position because the deprivation of liberty imparts more responsibility on the authorities concerned to ensure that any consequent suicidal ideation is properly dealt with. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 3:22 am
That's a pretty stark rule, and admits of little wiggle room. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 9:40 am by Eric Osterberg
  This is a stark example of the impact of the Supreme Court’s 2006 ruling in Ebay v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 12:25 pm by Forrest G. Read IV
This case is a stark reminder to H-1B employers that they must comply with wage obligations under the certified LCA unless the employee voluntarily reduces work, there is a bona fide termination of employment, or a new LCA becomes effective. [read post]