Search for: "State of Alabama v. United States" Results 1401 - 1420 of 2,037
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2017, 7:30 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
The entire statement is reprinted below: Supreme Court of the United States Christopher Anthony Floyd v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 2:09 pm
Over at CDW, Karl Keys provides this nuanced assessment of where matters now seem to stand in the moratorium debate:In light of the United States Supreme Court??? [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 7:52 pm
There will likely be no additional executions by lethal injection until at least after oral arguments & conference in Baze v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 11:13 am by Helen Alvare
Finally, in June, the court declined to review Alabama’s law banning abortions in which the fetal body is dismembered for extraction, in Harris v. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 11:31 am by Ronald Mann
” The issue in Office of the United States Trustee v. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 11:12 am by Jon Ibanez
” Unfortunately, the United States Supreme Court recently held that law enforcement can go off of an anonymous tip of a potential drunk driver in the case of Navarette v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 2:40 pm by Matthew Harwood
He continued to 1890, when a United States Supreme Court case described how even short stints in solitary left people “violently insane. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 10:39 am
Malcolm, 803 F.2d 46, 54 (2d Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 910 (1987) (city has standing for third-party claim against state as to claims based on prison overcrowding); United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 9:09 am by Amy Howe
Alabama Department of Revenue v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  As to them, however, we adhere to our general rule that we don’t do the other side’s research for them.AlabamaThe Alabama Supreme Court held, in E.R. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
From the States and Municipalities Alabama – Rep. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 1:02 pm by Steve Lubet
As Pelosi put it, Legitimate criticism of Israel’s policies is protected by the values of free speech and democratic debate that the United States and Israel share. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 9:27 am by Steve Hall
After losing in the federal appeals court in Atlanta, the firm persuaded a former United States solicitor general, Gregory G. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 4:18 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  The compromise was that the federal courts could effectively overturn a state judgment on a ground decided by the state courts if that decision was "contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]