Search for: "State of Alabama v. United States"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 2,146
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2024, 5:59 am
More than 100 of the cases occurred in Alabama. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 7:22 pm
However, the answer was swallowed by additional questions, and remained for the United States to deal with more fully. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
Dec. 30, 2009) (applying Alabama law); Adkins v. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 6:50 am
This issue was resolved by the United States Supreme Court in 1979 in the noteworthy case of William Orr v. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
Sun Life and Health Insurance Company et. al) and the other in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, Spartanburg Division (Duane Easler v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 10:33 am
United States. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 1:06 pm
United States, and then, in two consolidated cases, Stitt and Sims v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 4:00 am
In Whren v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 2:41 pm
S. 555 (1983), and United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2006, 9:53 pm
" Lastly, the Alabama Court of Criminal appeals in Michael Shannon Taylor v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 2:04 pm
Alabama, prohibiting a mandatory penalty of life-without-parole sentences for juveniles, and 2016’s Montgomery v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 6:59 am
As the court explained in its per curiam opinion in the eviction moratorium case, Alabama Association of Realtors v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 9:36 am
Alabama, supra. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 8:50 am
These philosophies also found their way into the controversial 2010 SCOTUS decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
Alabama getaway indeed. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:09 am
” Briefly: For The Washington Post, Robert Barnes explains why, when the Supreme Court “takes up the case of a small-time Alabama felon, Terance Gamble, who complains [in Gamble v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 10:32 am
United States. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 11:38 am
In Mitchell v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:35 am
Stern v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 3:44 pm
In the last Bush Administration, the President’s legal office stated that the Federal government could share enforcement of Federal policy with the States, and that the States therefore could have concurrent authority. [read post]
