Search for: "State v. Bill" Results 1401 - 1420 of 19,639
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2010, 1:52 pm by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
The Drug and Device Law Blog has a guest post on the status of the Medical Device Safety Act of 2009, a bill that has been introduced in Congress that would overturn the Supreme Court's holding in Riegel v. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 4:55 am
Yesterday's oral arguments in the case of City of Carmel v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 9:53 am
6-30-2009 Ohio:The 11th Appellate Dist court of Ohio has found the changes made by Senate bill 10 (made according to the Adam Walsh Act) unconstitutional in the case of Spangler v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 6:27 am by zshapiro
I’m working on an article on an interesting search and seizure case, out of the First Circuit, United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
It is well established that this “view” can exist both before and after publication (Campbell v MGN [2003] QB 633). [read post]
In 2019, the Kansas Supreme Court ruled in Hodes & Nauser v Schmidt that the Kansas Constitution protects a fundamental right to personal autonomy, which includes the right to decide whether to continue a pregnancy. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
” And keeping the police out of those sacred precincts was one function of “a right of privacy older than the Bill of Rights. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 1:38 pm by Stephen Griffin
 In any case, GOP governors in non-expansion states appear to be supporting the House and Senate bills. [read post]
29 May 2015, 10:17 am by Guest Blogger
  Pear’s piece has provoked an ongoing avalanche of fervid reactions from both friends and foes of the King v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 11:11 am by Eric Goldman
He’s Wrong * Senate’s “Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act of 2017”–and Section 230’s Imminent Evisceration * The “Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act of 2017” Bill Would Be Bad News for Section 230 * WARNING: Draft “No Immunity for Sex Traffickers Online Act” Bill Poses Major Threat to Section 230 * The Implications of Excluding State Crimes from 47 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 9:04 am by Native American Rights Fund
Nash (Tribal Enrollment) State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2017.htmlMichelle M. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 7:30 am by Dan Ernst
  Eight months later, in early 2012, in the long awaited decision in Edwards Aquifer Authority and the State of Texas v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 9:04 am by Native American Rights Fund
Nash (Tribal Enrollment) State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2017.htmlMichelle M. v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 4:47 am
Gamal Abdelaziz, Defendant/Appellant-and-United States, Appellee, v. [read post]